Table 4.
Proportion (in %) of the malaria vectors collected biting indoor by HLCs (endophagic rate)
| Species | Ambohitromby | Miarinarivo | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | Average proportion ± SE | T1 | T2 | T3 | Average proportion ± SE | |
| An. coustani | 16.00 (12/75) | 2.38 (1/42) | 1.85 (3/162) | 5.73 ± 1.39 | 31.82 (21/66) | 38.14 (37/97) | 25.89 (80/309) | 29.24 ± 2.09 |
| An. arabiensis | 29.69 (19/64) | 23.67 (49/207) | 30.00 (3/10) | 25.27 ± 2.59 | 56.25 (9/16) | 37.04 (30/81) | 50.00 (16/32) | 42.64 ± 4.35 |
| An. funestus | 41.18 (14/34) | 50.00 (13/26) | 77.50 (31/40) | 58.00 ± 4.94 | 88.89 (8/9) | 50.00 (7/14) | 49.15 (29/59) | 53.66 ± 5.51 |
| An. mascarensis | 16.67 (4/24) | 7.69 (1/13) | 0 (0/12) | 10.20 ± 4.32 | 20.00 (1/5) | 0 (0/2) | 10.00 (1/10) | 11.76 ± 7.81 |
Notes: Numbers in parenthesis represent the number of mosquitoes collected indoor over the total number of mosquitoes collected indoor and outdoor. Anopheles gambiae was not taken into account in this table due to its low number
Abbreviation: SE, standard error = sqrt (p(1 – p)/n)