Table 6.
Species | Ambohitromby | Miarinarivo | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time point | HBR | n | (+) | SR (%) | EIR | Time point | HBR | n | (+) | SR (%) | EIR | |
Anopheles coustani | T1 | 6.25 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T1 | 5.50 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
T2 | 3.50 | 25 | 2 | 8.00 | 0.28 | T2 | 8.08 | 95 | 5 | 5.26 | 0.43 | |
T3 | 13.50 | 159 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T3 | 25.75 | 297 | 7 | 2.36 | 0.61 | |
Total | 7.75 | 252 | 2 | 0.40 | 0.03 | Total | 13.11 | 457 | 12 | 2.63 | 0.34 | |
Anopheles arabiensis | T1 | 5.33 | 58 | 3 | 5.08 | 0.27 | T1 | 1.33 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
T2 | 17.25 | 166 | 3 | 1.78 | 0.31 | T2 | 6.75 | 81 | 3 | 3.70 | 0.25 | |
T3 | 0.83 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T3 | 2.67 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 7.81 | 234 | 6 | 2.52 | 0.20 | Total | 3.58 | 129 | 3 | 2.34 | 0.08 | |
Anopheles funestus | T1 | 2.83 | 35 | 1 | 2.86 | 0.08 | T1 | 0.75 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
T2 | 2.17 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T2 | 1.17 | 16 | 1 | 6.25 | 0.07 | |
T3 | 3.33 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T3 | 4.92 | 77 | 1 | 1.30 | 0.06 | |
Total | 2.78 | 105 | 1 | 0.95 | 0.03 | Total | 2.38 | 107 | 2 | 1.87 | 0.04 | |
All 3 species | T1 | 14.42 | 163 | 4 | 2.45 | 0.35 | T1 | 7.58 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
T2 | 22.92 | 222 | 5 | 2.25 | 0.52 | T2 | 16.00 | 192 | 9 | 4.69 | 0.75 | |
T3 | 17.67 | 215 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T3 | 33.33 | 406 | 8 | 1.97 | 0.66 | |
Total | 18.33 | 600 | 9 | 1.50 | 0.27 | Total | 18.97 | 692 | 17 | 2.46 | 0.47 |
Abbreviations: HBR, human-biting rate (the number of collected mosquitoes per number of human-night (12 at each time point in each village)). The HBR is expressed in bite/human/night (b/h/n); n, the number of anopheline mosquitoes collected by HLCs and analysed by real time PCR. The DNA was extracted from individual head-thorax; (+) corresponds to the number of Plasmodium positive samples confirmed by the TaqMan 18S; SR, sporozoite rate (the number of positive samples divided by the number of analysed samples (n), in %); EIR, entomological inoculation rate (EIR = HBR × SR). It is expressed as infective bite/human/night (ib/h/n)