Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 11;57(10):3884–3892. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04420-7

Table 3.

Duncan multiple comparison test results of mineral content of pasta samples (mg/100 g)

Variance source n Ca Fe K Mg P Zn
QFA type
 RQFB 8 28.31 ± 3.04b 1.89 ± 0.27b 291.14 ± 48.62b 47.35 ± 10.17b 243.93 ± 27.90b 1.60 ± 0.13b
 GQFC 8 32.93 ± 6.62a 1.99 ± 0.33a 336.28 ± 84.29a 52.21 ± 14.18a 257.54 ± 36.94a 1.77 ± 0.26a
QF ratio (%)
 0 4 24.34 ± 0.25d 1.58 ± 0.01d 229.64 ± 3.52d 34.90 ± 0.24d 212.17 ± 1.48d 1.44 ± 0.01d
 10 4 28.86 ± 1.86c 1.81 ± 0.05c 287.49 ± 18.19c 44.48 ± 1.73c 234.89 ± 6.16c 1.60 ± 0.08c
 20 4 32.82 ± 3.72b 2.08 ± 0.08b 340.59 ± 34.03b 54.19 ± 3.97b 263.04 ± 12.83b 1.77 ± 0.13b
 30 4 36.46 ± 5.13a 2.32 ± 0.10a 397.14 ± 52.20a 65.56 ± 5.72a 292.84 ± 12.61a 1.93 ± 0.19a

Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different (p < 0.05). Values are the average of triplicate measurements on the duplicate samples

AQuinoa flour

BRaw quinoa flour

DGerminated quinoa flour