Table B.7.

Processing factors (PF) for peeling and washing commodities with edible peel consumed raw for active substance/commodity combinations identified as risk drivers for CGA‐TCF

Active substance	Systemic/contact pesticide	Risk driver commodities with edible peel consumed raw	Contribution to the MOET	PFs washing	PFs peeling
Bromide ion	Systemic	Tomatoes	> 5%	Not considered where the mode of action is reported to be systemic	Not considered where the mode of action is reported to be systemic
Propineb	Contact action with protective properties and long residual activity (IUPAC)	Apples	> 5%	DRAR Italy, 2016 Apple, washed fruit Number of studies: 2 Propineb (determined as CS2) Proposed median processing factor (PF): < 0.37 Propineb (determined as PDA) Proposed PF: 0.46 PTU: Proposed PF: 0.46 (provisional). Data gap PTU residues where the samples are analysed within a time frame where PTU residues are demonstrated to be stable JMPR Evaluation, 2004 Apple, washed fruit Number of studies: 3 Propineb (determined as CS2) median processing factor (PF): < 0.4 Propineb (determined as PDA) median processing factor (PF): 0.4 PTU: Processing Factor could not be calculated as the residues were below the LOQ	DRAR Italy, 2016 Apple, peeled fruit Number of studies: 2 Propineb (determined as CS2) Proposed median processing factor (PF): < 0.03 Propineb (determined as PDA) Proposed PF: 0.07 PTU: Proposed PF: 0.02 (provisional). Data gap PTU residues where the samples are analysed within a time frame where PTU residues are demonstrated to be stable JMPR Evaluation, 2004 No data available
Ziram	Contact action with protective properties (IUPAC)	Apples	> 5%	DRAR Italy, 2018 Apple, washed fruit: processing studies available, no processing factor proposed JMPR Evaluation 1996 No data available	DRAR Italy, 2018 No data available JMPR Evaluation 1996 No data available