| Codea | Commodity | Existing EU MRL (mg/kg) | Proposed EU MRL (mg/kg) | Comment/justification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enforcement residue definition: Prothioconazole: prothioconazole‐desthio (sum of isomers)F | ||||
| 0213010 | Beetroots | 0.1 (ft 1) | 0.1 | The data gaps identified in the MRL review concerning residue trials and storage stability have been addressed. The MRL is confirmed. Risk for consumers unlikely |
| 0213020 | Carrots | |||
| 0213030 | Celeriacs/turnip rooted celeries | 0.01* | 0.1 | The submitted data are sufficient to support the intended NEU use. Risk for consumers unlikely |
| 0213040 | Horseradishes | 0.1 (ft 1) | 0.1 | The data gaps identified in the MRL review concerning residue trials and storage stability have been addressed. The MRL is confirmed. Risk for consumers unlikely |
| 0213060 | Parsnips | 0.1 (ft 1) | 0.1 | |
| 0213070 | Parsley roots/hamburg roots parsley | 0.1 (ft 1) | 0.1 | |
| 0213090 | Salsifies | 0.1 (ft 1) | 0.1 | |
| 0213100 | Swedes/rutabagas | 0.1 (ft 1) | 0.1 | |
| 0213110 | Turnips | 0.1 (ft 1) | 0.1 | |
| 0220020 | Onions | 0.05 (ft 1) | Further risk management considerations required | The data gap identified in the MRL review concerning residue trials is not addressed, whereas the data gap concerning storage stability has been addressedSince the data gap is not fully addressed, risk managers may consider the lowering of the existing MRL to the LOQ of 0.02 mg/kg |
| 0220030 | Shallots | 0.05 (ft 2) | ||
| 024100 | Flowering brassica | 0.05 (ft 3) | Further risk management considerations required | The data gap identified in the MRL review concerning residue trials is not addressed, whereas the data gap concerning storage stability has been addressedSince the data gaps are not fully addressed, risk managers may consider the lowering of the existing MRL to the LOQ of 0.02 mg/kg |
| 0242010 | Brussels sprouts | 0.1 (ft 3) | ||
| 0242020 | Head cabbages | 0.09 (ft 3) | ||
| 0270060 | Leeks | 0.06 (ft 3) | ||
| 0300010 | Beans | 0.05 (ft 3) | Further risk management considerations required | The data gaps identified by EFSA concerning residue trials and storage stability have not been addressedSince data gaps are not addressed, risk managers may consider lowering of the existing MRL to the LOQ of 0.02 mg/kg |
| 0300020 | Lentils | 1 (ft 3) | The existing EU MRL reflects CXL MRLThe data gaps identified by EFSA concerning residue trials and storage stability have not been addressedSince data gaps are not addressed, risk managers may consider lowering of the existing MRL to the LOQ of 0.02 mg/kg | |
| 0300030 | Peas | 1 (ft 3) | ||
| 0300040 | Lupins/lupini beans | 1 (ft 3) | ||
| 0401010 | Linseeds | 0.09 (ft 3) | 0.09 | The data gaps identified in the MRL review concerning residue trials and storage stability have been addressed The MRL is confirmed. Risk for consumers unlikely |
| 0401020 | Peanuts/groundnuts | 0.02* (ft 3) | 0.02* | The existing EU MRL reflects the CXL MRL. The data gap identified by EFSA concerning storage stability has been addressed. The data gap concerning residue trials is considered addressed since for oilseeds a reliable conversion factor of 2 from enforcement to risk assessment is derived from submitted residue trials on oilseed rape. The MRL is confirmed. Risk for consumers unlikely |
| 0401030 | Poppy seeds | 0.09 (ft 3) | 0.09 | The data gaps identified by EFSA concerning residue trials and storage stability have been addressed. The MRL is confirmed. Risk for consumers unlikely |
| 0401060 | Rapeseeds/canola seeds | 0.15 (ft 3) | 0.2 | The data gaps identified by EFSA concerning residue trials and storage stability have been addressed. The additional residue trials submitted in support of the intended SEU use indicated that a higher MRL would be required. Risk for consumers unlikely |
| 0401080 | Mustard seeds | 0.09 (ft 3) | 0.09 | The data gaps identified by EFSA concerning residue trials and storage stability have been addressed. The MRL is confirmed. Risk for consumers unlikely |
| 0401130 | Gold of pleasure seeds | 0.04 (ft 3) | 0.04 | The data gap identified by EFSA concerning storage stability has been addressedThe data gap concerning residue trials is considered addressed since for oilseeds a reliable conversion factor of 2 from enforcement to risk assessment is derived from submitted residue trials on oilseed rapeThe MRL is confirmed. Risk for consumers unlikely |
| 0500010 | Barley | 0.2 (ft 3) | Further risk management considerations required | The existing EU MRL reflects CXL MRLThe data gap identified by EFSA concerning residue trials is not addressed. The data gap identified by EFSA concerning storage stability has been addressedSince the data gaps are not fully addressed, risk managers may consider lowering of the existing MRL to the LOQ of 0.02 mg/kg |
| 0500050 | Oat | 0.05 (ft 3) | ||
| 0500070 | Rye | 0.05 (ft 3) | 0.05 | The existing EU MRL reflects CXL MRLThe data gap identified by EFSA concerning residue trials for NEU use is not addressed. The data gap identified by EFSA concerning storage stability has been addressedSince the data gaps are not fully addressed, risk managers may consider lowering of the existing MRL to the LOQ of 0.02 mg/kg |
| 0500090 | Wheat | 0.1 (ft 3) | 0.1 | The existing EU MRL reflects CXL MRLFor the authorised SEU use the data gaps identified by EFSA concerning residue trials and storage stability has been addressed. The tentative MRL of 0.02* mg/kg as derived by MRL review is confirmed. Risk for consumers unlikely |
| 1011030 | Swine liver | 0.5 (ft 4) | Further risk management considerations required | The residue trials on grass (major component of livestock dietary burden) have not been submitted and thus the EU livestock dietary burden from existing EU uses including grass cannot be properly calculatedThe relevance of this data gap shall be considered by risk managers, given the fact that the existing EU MRLs for commodities of animal origin are based on CXLs (in 2018 lowered to 0.3 mg/kg), which are derived for significantly higher livestock dietary burdens |
| 1011040 | Swine kidney | |||
| 1011050 | Swine edible offals | |||
| 1012030 | Bovine liver | |||
| 1012040 | Bovine kidney | |||
| 1012050 | Bovine edible offals | |||
| 1012030 | Sheep liver | |||
| 1012040 | Sheep kidney | |||
| 1012050 | Sheep edible offals | |||
| 1014030 | Goat liver | |||
| 1014040 | Goat kidney | |||
| 1014050 | Goat edible offals | |||
| 1015030 | Equine liver | |||
| 1015040 | Equine kidney | |||
| 1015050 | Equine edible offals | |||
| 1017030 | Other farmed terrestrial animals liver | |||
| 1017040 | Other farmed terrestrial animals kidney | |||
| 1017050 | Other farmed terrestrial animals edible offals | |||
| 1020000 | Milk | 0.01* (ft 4) | ||
MRL: maximum residue level; NEU: northern Europe; SEU: southern Europe; CXL: codex maximum residue limit.
Indicates that the MRL is set at the limit of analytical quantification (LOQ).
Commodity code number according to Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
Fat soluble.
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials and storage stability data complying with the proposed residue definition as unavailable. When re‐viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 27 January 2018, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. (Footnote related to data gaps No 3 and 5).
ft 2: The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods and storage stability data complying with the proposed residue definition as unavailable. When re‐viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 27 January 2018, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. (Footnote related to data gap No 3).
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials and storage stability data complying with the proposed residue definition as unavailable. When re‐viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 27 January 2018, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. (Footnote related to data gaps No 3 and 5).
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials on grass (major component of the livestock dietary burden), as unavailable. When re‐viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 27 January 2018, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. (Footnote related to data gap No 2).