Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 20;18(4):e06092. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6092

Table 2.

Summary of the generic Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment (mgQMRA) input data for blanched frozen vegetables (bfV) consumed with or without cooking for the baseline scenario and best‐case and worst‐case uncertainty scenarios

Parameter Distributiona Input parameters Baseline scenario Input parameters for best‐case uncertainty scenario Input parameters for worst‐case uncertainty scenario Comments or percentiles used for best‐case and worse‐case
Prevalence of L. monocytogenes in bfV Beta

alpha = (147 + 1)

beta = (1,288‐147 + 1)

p = 0.114 p = 0.098 p = 0.133 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles
Initial concentration of L. monocytogenes in bfV (log10 CFU/g) – surveys/studies + FBO data Beta‐general

Min = −1.69

Max = 5

Shape 1 = 0.094

Shape 2 = 2.839

Used as baseline

Shape 1 = 0.121

Shape 2 = 3.819

Shape 1 = 0.073

Shape 2 = 2.217

2.5th and 97.5th percentiles
Exponential growth rate (expressed as log10 /h) of L. monocytogenes in heat‐treated vegetables at a reference temperature of 5°C (EGR5°C) Lognormal

Mean = 0.0117

SD = 0.00816

Max = 0.0319

All scenarios All scenarios All scenarios Not evaluated in the uncertainty analysis
Serving size of vegetables (g) Constant Mean = 49 Used as baseline 31 g 106 g 20th and 80th percentiles, respectively
Maximum population density (log10 CFU/g) of L. monocytogenes in vegetables Constant Mean = 7.83 Used as baseline 5.43 9.78 Minimum and maximum Nmax

Consumer storage time outside the freezer = (remaining shelf‐life × proportion being used)

Remaining shelf‐life (h)

Proportion being used

Exponential with rate = 1/mean shelf‐life

Beta‐Pert

Mean shelf‐life = 12 h (‘cooked’ vegetables)

Mean shelf‐life = 24 h (‘RTE’ vegetables)

Max = 96 h

Minimum = 0

Most likely = 0.3

Maximum = 1.1

All scenarios All scenarios All scenarios Not evaluated
Storage temperature at consumer fridge (°C) Truncated Normal

Mean = 5.9°C

SD = 2.9°C

Lower = −2°C

Upper = 15°C

All scenarios All scenarios All scenarios Not evaluated – same for all foods
Reduction of L. monocytogenes in the event of cooking (log10 units) Beta‐Pert

Min = 1 log10

Most likely = 5 log10

Maximum = 9 log10

Used as baseline Same as baseline Most likely = 3 Reasonable assumptions
Dose response of L. monocytogenes for the elderly population Log‐normal exponential model

Females: Mean = −13.7020

SD = 1.6154

Males:

Mean = −13.5598

SD = 1.6154

All scenarios All scenarios All scenarios Not evaluated‐ The same uncertainty over all food categories so less important for the uncertainty related to the comparison
Annual number of servings of bfV for the elderly population Constant 2.65 × 109 (females); 2.28 × 109 (males) Baseline 1.63 × 109 (females); 1.38 × 109 (males) 3.15 × 109 (females); 2.74 × 109 (males) Public health impact evaluated in scenario analysis
Proportion of servings of bfV consumed cooked or uncooked by the elderly population Constant Cooked = 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 and uncooked = 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 0 Proportions based on label information Willis et al. (2019): cooked: 96%; uncooked = 4% Proportions based on label information Willis et al. (2019): cooked: 77%, uncooked = 23% Different proportions were evaluated in separate scenario analyses
a

The same distributions as used in the gQMRA in EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (2018), except for the log10 reduction for cooking which was not included in that model.