Table 3.
Subtest results. Green highlighting indicates significantly reduced performance compared to the norm sample.
| Size of standardization sample | Number of valid results | Median | SD | P‐value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CERAD‐PLUS subtests | |||||
| Semantic fluency | 1100# | 63 (98%) | −0.48 | 1.13 | 0.001 1 |
| Boston naming test | 1100# | 63 (98%) | 0.39 | 0.98 | 0.113 2 |
| Wordlist learning | 1100# | 63 (98%) | −0.64 | 1.33 | 0.000 1 |
| Wordlist learning recall | 1100# | 63 (98%) | −0.51 | 1.00 | 0.001 1 |
| Wordlist learning intrusions | 1100# | 63 (98%) | 0.33 | 1.06 | 0.470 2 |
| Wordlist learning recognition | 1100# | 63 (98%) | −0.50 | 0.96 | 0.000 1 |
| Figures drawing | 1100# | 63 (98%) | 0.52 | 1.05 | 0.349 2 |
| Figures recall | 1100# | 63 (98%) | −0.27 | 1.26 | 0.609 2 |
| Phonemic fluency | 604# | 63 (98%) | −0.22 | 1.02 | 0.002 1 |
| Trail making test A | 604# | 63 (98%) | 0.04 | 1.39 | 0.569 1 |
| Trail making test B | 604# | 59 (92%) | −0.14 | 1.49 | 0.735 1 |
| TAP subtests | |||||
| Alertness without warning sound (reaction time) | 604## | 64 (100%) | −0.99 | 1.01 | 0.000 2 |
| Alertness with warning sound (reaction time) | 604## | 64 (100%) | −0.92 | 0.95 | 0.000 2 |
| Divided attention false positive (errors, N) | 808## | 63 (98%) | −0.71 | 1.01 | 0.000 1 |
| Working memory false positive (errors, N) | 322## | 60 (94%) | −0.31 | 0.96 | 0.001 2 |
| Sustained attention total false positive (errors, N) | 188## | 46 (72%) | 0.41 | 1.21 | 0.046 2 |
References: # https://www.memoryclinic.ch/de/main‐navigation/neuropsychologen/cerad‐plus/auswertungprogramme/cerad‐plus‐online/. ## https://www.psytest.net/index.php?page=normierung&hl=de_DE
1
Analysis via two‐sided t‐test.
2
Analysis via Wilcoxon test.