Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 11;9(8):e19701. doi: 10.2196/19701

Table 2.

Power analysis by hypothesized group.

Hypothesis Groups Full (N) 80% reduction of full N after SSEa due to response Alpha valuesb Power Cohen effect size
1 All 1632 1306 .00207 0.999 0.52
2 Native American/Alaskan Native 200 160 .0083 0.830 0.52
3 Asian 200 160 .0083 0.830 0.52
4 Black 300 240 .00417 0.920 0.52
5 Latinx (English-speaking) 182 146 .00417 0.920 0.52
6 White 300 240 .00417 0.920 0.52
7 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islanders 200 160 .0083 0.830 0.52
8 Latinx (Spanish-speaking) 250 200 .00102 0.939 0.52
9 Urban (nonrural) 1224 979 .00207 0.999 0.52
10 Rural 408 326 .00207 0.960 0.52
11 Low SESc 408 326 .00207 0.960 0.52
12 Mid/high SES 1224 979 .00207 0.999 0.52
13 Age 1632 1306 .00207 0.999 0.52

aSSE: SMART Sex Ed.

bThe total alpha after Bonferroni adjustment was .05. The full sample size will be increased by 15% to account for projected attrition to a final total of 1878. The 15% increase will be equally distributed across all subgroups (ie, Native American/Alaskan Native, Asian, Black, Latinx-English, White, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and Latinx-Spanish).

cSES: socioeconomic status