Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 11;4(2):1140–1147. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa081

Table 2.

Flavor intensity of cooked LT and GS patty samples from lambs of different age, sex, and offered different energy sources at different levels

Diet* Lamb age Sex
Item WSC100 AP WSC85 SEM† Short fed Long fed SEM† Ewe Wether SEM†
Natural log transformation
LT lamb flavor intensity 3.56ab 3.59a 3.45b 0.157 3.44f 3.63e 0.156 3.56 3.51 0.156
LT off-flavor intensity 0.47 0.71 0.21 0.492 0.21f 0.71e 0.487 0.43 0.49 0.487
GS lamb flavor intensity 3.49 d 3.67c 3.44d 0.102 3.45f 3.62e 0.099 3.57 3.50 0.099
GS off-flavor intensity 0.32 0.15 0.42 0.463 0.01f 0.60e 0.454 0.47 0.13 0.455
Back transformation‡
LT lamb flavor intensity 35.16a 36.28a 31.63b 31.09f 37.83e 35.05 33.56
LT off-flavor intensity 1.60 2.03 1.23 1.24f 2.04e 1.54 1.64
GS lamb flavor intensity 32.66d 39.41c 31.17d 31.49f 37.21e 35.46 33.05
GS off-flavor intensity 1.38 1.16 1.52 0.99f 1.82e 1.60 1.13

*WSC100 = ad libitum access to a whole-shelled corn diet, AP = ad libitum access to an alfalfa pellet diet, and WSC85 = whole-shelled corn diet offered at 85% of ad libitum computed from WSC100 contemporaries.

†The reported SEM is the greatest between the levels within the treatments.

‡The back transformation is on a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 = very mild and 100 = very intense.

a,bDiet means within a row without a common superscript letter differ (P ≤ 0.05).

c,dAge means within a row without a common superscript letter differ (P ≤ 0.05).