. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Nov 6;5(2):194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.10.010

Table 2.

Correlations Between Amygdala Responses to Looming Faces and Levels of Resilience

	Region of Interest

	Left Amygdala		Right Amygdala		Left + Right Amygdala

Region of Interest Definition	Correlation Coefficient (r)	p Value	Correlation Coefficient (r)	p Value	Correlation Coefficient (r)	p Value

Anatomical (FreeSurfer Segmentation)	−.41	.03	−.28	.16	−.36	.06

Functional (Voxel Threshold .05)	−.52	.01	−.42	.03	−.50	.01

Functional (Voxel Threshold .01)	−.52	.01	−.36	.06	−.46	.01

Functional (Voxel Threshold .001)	−.49	.01	−.35	.07	−.45	.02

Amygdala responses for each subject were extracted using regions of interest that were either defined anatomically (in the primary analysis) or defined using the between-group comparison (family history of depression vs. no family history of depression) voxelwise maps generated using 3 different thresholds (p = .05, p = .01, and p = .001). Significant correlations with resilience levels (measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale) in the family history–positive group [n = 27]) are observed regardless of the type of amygdala region of interest used to extract the functional magnetic resonance imaging data.