TABLE 3.
Evaluation of the discrepancy resultsa
| Discrepancy type | Sample name | Sequence detected by: |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANDAA (cutoff, ≥5%) | Sanger sequencing (cutoff, ≥20%) | NGS (cutoff, ≥2%) | ||
| False positive | P 053 | K65R | WT | Failed |
| P 082 | K103N | WT | Failed | |
| P 096 | K103N | WT | K103N | |
| P 025 | Y181C | WT | WT | |
| P 033 | Y181C | WT | WT | |
| P 040 | Y181C | WT | WT | |
| P 061 | Y181C | WT | Failed | |
| P 073 | Y181C | WT | Failed | |
| P 094 | Y181C | WT | WT | |
| P 098 | Y181C | WT | Failed | |
| P 107 | Y181C | WT | Failed | |
| P 113 | Y181C | WT | Failed | |
| P 120 | Y181C | WT | WT | |
| P 121 | Y181C | WT | WT | |
| P 122 | Y181C | WT | Y181C | |
| P 124 | Y181C | WT | WT | |
| P 129 | Y181C | WT | Y181C | |
| P 130 | Y181C | WT | WT | |
| P 132 | Y181C | WT | WT | |
| P 140 | Y181C | WT | WT | |
| P 147 | Y181C | WT | WT | |
| P 002 | G190A | G190S | G190S | |
| P 023 | G190A | G190E | Failed | |
| P 046 | G190A | G190S | G190S | |
| P 060 | G190A | G190S | G190AS | |
| P 062 | G190A | WT | Failed | |
| P 121 | G190A | G190E | G190A | |
| P 127 | G190A | G190E | G190E | |
| P 129 | G190A | WT | WT | |
| P 149 | G190A | G190S | G190S | |
| False negative | P 008 | WT | K65R | K65R |
| P 107 | WT | K65, M184V | Failed | |
| P 132 | WT | K103N | K103N | |
| P 082 | WT | Y181C, G190A | Failed | |
NGS, next-generation sequencing; WT, wild-type virus. The PANDAA assay (≥5%) was assessed against Sanger sequencing for drug resistance mutations detected at ≥20%. We hypothesized that mutations detected by PANDAA and not by Sanger sequencing could represent low-abundance variants. These were later verified by NGS (≥2%). G190A/S/E mutations are nonpolymorphic mutations selected by EFV and NVP.