TABLE 3.

Prevalence of lab results by CT and/or NG status and city^a

Test and result	Overall					Lusaka	Ndola
	Either CT and/or NG (n = 124)		CT/NG uninfected (n = 701)		Fisher’s P value either CT and/or NG vs uninfected	Fisher’s P value either CT and/or NG vs uninfected	Fisher’s P value either CT and/or NG vs uninfected
	N	(%)	N	(%)
Trichomonas vaginalis (microscopy)					<0.01b	0.02	0.02
Positive	13	10	23	3
Negative	106	85	651	93
Data missing	5	4	27	4
HIV rapid test					0.77	0.69	0.41
Positive or discrepant	4	3	20	3
Negative	119	96	675	96
Data missing	1	1	6	1
Sperm (microscopy)					0.37b	1.00	0.44b
Positive	5	4	43	6
Negative	109	88	609	87
Data missing	10	8	49	7
Candida (microscopy)					0.41	1.00	0.56
Positive	2	2	24	3
Negative	100	81	555	79
Data missing	22	18	122	17
BV (both KOH and clue cells)					0.02b	1.00	<0.01b
Positive	37	30	147	21
Negative	62	50	425	61
Data missing	25	20	129	18
New syphilis infection (based on RPR)					0.02	1.00	0.01
Yes	8	6	13	2
No	88	71	454	65
Data missing	28	23	234	33

^aBV, bacterial vaginosis; CT, Chlamydia trachomatis; KOH, potassium hydroxide; NG, Neisseria gonorrhoeae; RPR, rapid plasma reagin.

^bχ² P value.