Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 24;58(9):e00176-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00176-20

TABLE 4.

Logistic regression model of factors associated with either CT and/or NGa

Predictor of CT and/or NG No. % Multivariate final model (n = 496)
Adj. odds ratio Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Adj. P value
City
    Ndola 88 14 Ref
    Lusaka 36 18 2.07 1.04 4.13 0.04
Age group
    Age 18–24 91 18 1.97 1.13 3.45 0.02
    Age 25+ 30 10 Ref
Education
    No school or primary school only 85 17 2.19 1.20 4.03 0.01
    Secondary school or higher 38 13 Ref
Unprotected sex (last 1–3 mo)b
    None 29 13
    At least once 62 19
Uses LARC method
    No LARC 72 14 Ref
    Uses implant or IUD 48 18 1.65 0.99 2.75 0.06
Trichomonas vaginalis (microscopy)
    Positive 13 36 3.96 1.53 10.28 <0.01
    Negative 106 14 Ref
BV (Both KOH and clue cells)
    Positive 37 20 1.87 1.05 3.34 0.03
    Negative 62 13 Ref
New syphilis infection (based on RPR)
    Yes 8 38 4.58 1.63 12.93 <0.01
    No 88 16 Ref
a

Adj, adjusted; CI, confidence interval; CT, Chlamydia trachomatis; IUD, intrauterine device; KOH, potassium hydroxide; LARC, long-acting reversible contraception; NG, Neisseria gonorrhoeae; ref, reference group; RPR, rapid plasma reagin.

b

Pragmatically eliminated from the multivariate model.