Table 5:
Reliability assessment of the CRS-PRO and SNOT-22 in both CRS with and without polyps subgroups.
| CRSsNP | CRSwNP | |
|---|---|---|
| Cronbach’s alpha | ||
| CRS-PRO 21 item | 0.91 | 0.88 |
| CRS-PRO 12-Item | 0.87 | 0.82 |
| SNOT-22 | 0.93 | 0.94 |
| Test-Retest Correlation (Pearson’s Correlation) | ||
| CRS-PRO 21 item | 0.83** | 0.82** |
| CRS-PRO 12-Item | 0.80** | 0.83** |
| SNOT-22 | 0.75** | 0.91** |
| ICC | ||
| CRS-PRO 21 item | 0.90 (F=10.5, p<0.0005) | 0.88 (F=10.54 P0.0005) |
| CRS-PRO 12-Item | 0.88 (F=8.94 P<0.0005) | 0.88 (F=9.8 P0.0005) |
| SNOT-22 | 0.85 (F=6.75 P<0.0005) | 0.96 ( F=21.3 P0.0005) |
p<0.05
p<0.01.
Cronbach’s coefficient alpha evaluates internal consistency reliability. A Cronbach alpha >0.70 is considered to be adequate.
ICC- intra-class correlation coefficient, an ICC greater than 0.75 is considered good, greater than 0.90 is considered excellent.