Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 26;21:223. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01488-9

Table 3.

Baseline characteristics of enrolled participants for each trial included in meta-analysis: II

Author (year) Age (yrs) (mean or median) (I/C) Sex ratio Male/Female Participants randomised/includedd, Treatment administeredc Proportion HIV infected at baselinea Proportion with MDR-TBa
Martineau 2011 [21] 30.7 (24.5–41.5) /30.5 (24.8–38.4)b 98/28 146/126, at 0, 2, 4 & 6 weeks 5/93 (5.4) 1/135 (0.7)
Daley 2015 [16] 41·6 ± 15·1/ 43·7 ± 14·3″ 189/58 247/211, at 0, 2, 4, & 6 weeks 0/209 (0) 1/209 (0.5)
Farazi 2017 [36] 52.4 ± 17.6/ 51.8 ± 18.2″ 31/29 68/60 at week 0 only 0/60 (0) ND
Mily 2015 [18] 27.2 ± 8.0 / 26.7 ± 8.1″ 177/111 288/260 daily for 8 weeks ND 7/260 (2.7)
Nursyam 2006 [37] 29.85 ± 11.08 / 32.55 ± 11.6″ 39/28 67/67 daily for 6 weeks 0/67 (0) ND
Ralph 2013 [20] 29 (15–65)/ 26 (15–73) b 131/69 200/164 at 0 & 4 weeks 19/123 (15.4) 2/164 (1.2)
Salahuddin 2013 [14] 27.8 ± 13.2 / 28.3 ± 14.1″ 141/118 259/259 at 0 & 4 weeks ND ND
Tukvadze 2015 [39] 32.4 6 ± 10.6 / 34.1 6 ± 12.4″ 127/72 199/192 weekly for 8 weeks,then fortnightly for 8 weeks 3/184 (1.6) 23/192 (12.0)
Wejse 2009 [38] 37 ± 13/ 38 ± 14” 222/145 367/241 at 0,20 & 32 weeks 82/240 (34.2) ND
Johnson 2003 [40] 26.7 ± 7 / 27.4 ± 7″ 75/35 110/110 daily for 4 1/2 weeks 0/110 (0) 2/110 (1.8)
Mayanja-Kizza 2005 [41] 31.0 ± 7.1/ 31 ± 7.2″ 113/74 187/187 daily for 8 weeks 187/187 (100) ND
Pedral-Sampaio 2003 [44] 31.6 ± 10.9/ 28.0 ± 6.2″ 16/15 31/31twice weekly for 4 weeks 0/31 (0) ND
Willis 1996 [42] 28.1 ± 0.7 / 29.9 ± 1.0″ NM 107/107 daily for 16 weeks 107/107 (100) ND
Mahakalkar 2017 [43] 31.96 ± 13.14 / 29.79 ± 11.12″ 27/21 62/48 daily for 8 week ND NM
Ganmaa 2017 [15] 31 (23–44) / 35 (25–47) b 256/134 390/390 at 0, 2, 4 & 6 weeks ND 21/390 (5.4)

I/C Intervention & control groups, Anti-TB Anti-tuberculosis, ND not determined, NM not mentioned, MDR-TB multi-drug resistance tuberculosis, yrs. years, HIV human immuno deficiency virus

a: where denominators are less than total number of included participants, data are missing; “:mean age; b:median age; c: frequency at which adjunct treatment was administered; d:number of participants included in the final analysis