Table 1.
Models | np | Estimates of parameters | lnL | LRT pairs | df | 2∆lnL | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M0: one ratio | 1 | ω = 0.12224 | − 5255.0007 | M0 /M2 | 3 | 249.899394 | < 0.005 |
M1a: neutral | 2 |
p0 = 0.74332, (p1 = 0.25668), ω0 = 0.06658, (ω1 = 1.00) |
− 5164.268639 | ||||
M2a: selection | 4 |
p0 = 0.41411, p1 = 0.29296, (p2 = 0.29293), ω0 = 0.02081, (ω1 = 1.00), ω2 = 0.14800 |
− 5130.051003 | M1/M2 | 2 | 68.435272 | < 0.005 |
M7: beta | 2 | p = 0.53605, q = 2.52403 | − 5119.765697 | M7/M8 | 2 | 7.47398 | < 0.025 |
M8: beta and ω | 4 |
p0 = 0.66950, (p1 = 0.33050), P = 0.29052, q = 0.92947, ω = 0.09129 |
− 5116.028707 |
Abbreviation, np Number of free parameters; lnL Log likelihood; LRT Likelihood ratio test; df Degrees of freedom; 2ΔlnL Twice the log-likelihood difference of the models compared