Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Struct. 2019 Jun 10;1195:620–631. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.06.005

Table 4.

The change in the electron density distribution between optimized S0 and T1 estimated by calculating the partial atomic charges e using QTAIM using B3LYP/LANL2DZ for Rudcbpy, Rudamidebpy, Ru(2H)dcbpy, and Ru(2CO)dcbpy, and PBE0/LANL2DZ for Rubpy and RudMebpy.

Complex S0 T1


Ru bpy Xbpy* 2P Ph Ru bpy Xbpy* 2P Ph*
Rubpy 0.639 0.064 - 3.549 −2.906 0.795 −0.561 - 3.733 −2.722
Rudcbpy 0.669 0.301 −0.386 3.412 −2.764 0.838 −0.197 −0.989 3.581 −2.558
Rudamidebpy 0.669 0.119 0.661 3.411 −2.777 0.845 −0.386 0.081 3.574 −2.583
RudMebpy 0.626 −0.011 0.289 3.601 −2.969 0.806 −0.573 −0.353 3.763 −2.782
Ru(2H)dcbpy 0.474 0.123 −0.275 3.339 −3.075 0.625 −0.257 −0.399 3.408 −2.972
Ru(2CO)dcbpy 0.869 0.365 −0.020 3.461 −2.418 0.885 0.255 −0.067 3.486 −2.287
*

X is the substituent and (Ph) is the phenyl rings for both ligands.