Table 5.
Computed absorption, excitation and electronic transitions for theoretical complexes using B3LYP/LANL2DZ.
complex | λabs (nm) | λexit. (nm) | f | major contribution | % composition | character |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rudamidebpy | 428.1 | 420.8 | 0.09 | H → L (95%) | H: Ru 45%; (PPh3)2 49% | Ru, (PPh3)2 → damidebpy |
L: bpy 86%; (CONHCH3)2 9% | ||||||
320.1 | 297.2 | 0.19 | H-17 → L (31%) | H-17:(PPh3)2 46%; bpy 42%; (CONHCH3)2 12% | (PPh3)2,(CONHCH3)2 → bpy | |
324.3 | 0.13 | H-1 → L+3 (17%) | L+3: (PPh3)2 74%; Ru 21% | Ru → (PPh3)2 | ||
H → L+3 (57%) | H-1:Ru 52%; (PPh3)2 44% | Ru → (PPh3)2 | ||||
316.9 | 0.07 | H-8→ L (27%) | H-8: (PPh3)2 89% | (PPh3)2 →damidebpy | ||
H → L+2 (37%) | L+2: damidebpy 96% | Ru, (PPh3)2 → damidebpy | ||||
310.5 | 0.07 | H-13 → L (19%) | H-13: (CONHCH3)2 41%; (PPh3)2 55% | (PPh3)2,(CONHCH3)2 → bpy | ||
H-9 → L (25%) | H-9: (PPh3)2 62%; bpy 19%; (CONHCH3)2 17% | (PPh3)2,(CONHCH3)2 → bpy | ||||
326.8 | 0.06 | H→ L+1 (76%) | Ru, (PPh3)2 → damidebpy | |||
Ru(2H)dcbpy | 454.6 | 502.6 | 0.20 | H-1 →L+1 (97%) | H-1: (PPh3)225%, Ru 57%, bpy 17% | Ru,(PPh3)2→ dcbpy |
444.0 | 0.14 | H-1 →L+2 (77%) | L+1: bpy 82%, (COOH)2 16% | Ru,(PPh3)2→ dcbpy | ||
457.5 | 0.11 | H-2 →L+1 (75%) | L+2: bpy 93%, (COOH)2 4% | Ru,(PPh3)2→ dcbpy | ||
H-2: (PPh3)211%, Ru 83% | ||||||
576.3 | 0.18 | H-1 →L (67%) | L+1: bpy 78%, (COOH)2 8% | Ru,(PPh3)2→ dcbpy | ||
357.1 | 360.8 | 0.23 | H-1 →L+3 (83%) | L+3: (PPh3)291%, Ru 8% | Ru → (PPh3)2 | |
355.2 | 0.12 | H-1 →L+3 (83%) | ||||
Ru(2CO)dcbpy | 436.0 | 428.5 | 0.34 | H→ L (99%) | H: Ru 10%, (PPh3)2 89% | Ru,(PPh3)2→ dcbpy |
L: bpy 87%, (COOH)2 7% | ||||||
332.8 | 341.5 | 0.99 | H→ L+2 (91%) | L+2: Ru 36%, (PPh3)2 55% | (PPh3)2→ (2CO), Ru | |
331.9 | 0.58 | H→ L+2 (92%) | (2CO) 5% |