Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;64(9):e00152-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00152-20

TABLE 5.

Comparison of in vitro extracellular promastigote susceptibility to the selected AP series before and after in vivo passage (mouse and sandfly) between the wild type and the generated clones

Time relative to passage Compound Mean IC50 (μM) ± SEMa
Wild type LEM3323Cl4/1044Cl1 LEM3323Cl4/8012Cl2
Original DNDI-1044 0.46 ± 0.05 3.37 ± 0.54 (7.3)**** 2.63 ± 0.25 (5.7)***
DNDI-8012 0.66 ± 0.09 4.12 ± 0.89 (6.2)**** 3.81 ± 0.43 (5.7)****
DNDI-5561 0.80 ± 0.08 9.28 ± 1.01 (11) 7.68 ± 1.09 (9.6)*
After mouse passage DNDI-1044 0.61 ± 0.09 0.64 ± 0.10 (1.0) 1.86 ± 0.15 (3.0)
DNDI-8012 0.73 ± 0.15 1.01 ± 0.06 (1.4) 2.68 ± 0.29 (3.7)
DNDI-5561 0.68 ± 0.05 0.95 ± 0.16 (1.4) 2.18 ± 0.54 (3.2)
After sandfly passage DNDI-1044 0.51 ± 0.07 0.55 ± 0.10 (1.1) 1.36 ± 0.27 (2.6)
DNDI-8012 0.78 ± 0.12 0.85 ± 0.13 (1.1) 1.76 ± 0.17 (2.2)*
DNDI-5561 0.74 ± 0.08 0.76 ± 0.07 (1.0) 1.20 ± 0.39 (1.6)
a

Results are based on three independent replicates run in duplicate. The resistance index (RI) is given in parentheses and was always calculated with respect to the corresponding wild type. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.