Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 25;9:e58567. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58567

Table 2. Mendelian randomization estimates for effects of genetically mimicked statins (effect sizes of LDL-cholesterol) and of genetically predicted testosterone (effect size) on IHD in men and women using the UK Biobank.

Table 2—source data 1. Genetic associations for men.
Table 2—source data 2. genetic associations for women.
Mendelian randomization estimates
Exposure # SNPs Method OR 95% CI P value MR-Egger intercept p-value
Men Statin mimic 1 Inverse variance weighted 0.55 0.38 to 0.79 0.001
Statin mimic 6 Inverse variance weighted 0.54 0.33 to 0.89 0.02
Testosterone 125 Inverse variance weighted 1.11 1.04 to 1.19 0.003
Testosterone 125 Weighted median 1.18 1.06 to 1.31 0.002
Testosterone 125 MR-Egger 1.10 0.98 to 1.23 0.09 0.01 (0.84)
Women Statin mimic 1 Inverse variance weighted 0.87 0.59 to 1.27 0.46
Statin mimic 6 Inverse variance weighted 0.79 0.54 to 1.13 0.20
Testosterone 254 Inverse variance weighted 0.96 0.89 to 1.03 0.29
Testosterone 254 Weighted median 1.03 0.92 to 1.14 0.63
Testosterone 254 MR-Egger 1.08 0.94 to 1.23 0.27 −0.004 (0.05)

One statin SNP is rs12916, and six statin SNPs additionally included rs5909, rs10066707, rs17238484, rs2006760 and rs2303152 taking into account all their correlations. The unit of LDL-cholesterol is approximately 0.83 mm/L. An effect size of testosterone is approximately, 0.23 nmol/L in women (Haring et al., 2012) and 3.1 nmol/L in men (Mohr et al., 2005).