Table 3.
Analyzed data | Total score on TIGTIC | Sen. (%) | Spe. (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | LR+ | LR- | DA (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A: Intentional negative response cases excluded (N=267) | 2 | 84.6 | 66.2 | 30.0 | 96.2 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 67.4 |
3 | 84.6 | 77.2 | 38.8 | 96.7 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 76.6 | |
4 | 71.8 | 90.4 | 56.0 | 94.9 | 7.5 | 0.3 | 85.7 | |
5 | 59.0 | 95.2 | 67.6 | 93.1 | 12.3 | 0.4 | 87.9 | |
B: All subjects included (N=273) | 2 | 73.3 | 66.2 | 30.0 | 92.6 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 67.4 |
3 | 77.3 | 77.2 | 38.8 | 93.6 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 76.6 | |
4 | 62.2 | 90.4 | 56.0 | 92.4 | 6.5 | 0.4 | 85.7 | |
5 | 51.1 | 95.2 | 67.6 | 90.8 | 10.6 | 0.5 | 87.9 |
Sen.: sensitivity, Spe.: specificity, PPV: positive predictive value, NPV: negative predictive value, DA: diagnostic accuracy, LR+: positive likelihood ratio, LR-: negative likelihood ratio