Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 27;27(2):244–252. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.08.010

Table 2.

Crude outcomes of patients in the different treatment arms. Data are number (proportion) of patients with known exposure to the variable except where specified

No treatment (n = 344) Tocilizumab (n = 88) p valuea Corticosteroids, intermediate–high dose (n = 117) p valueb Corticosteroids, pulse dose (n = 78) p valuec Combination (n = 151) p valued
Primary outcomee 69/344 (20.1) 10/88 (11.4) 0.05 27/117 (23.1) 0.57 12/78 (15.4) 0.28 40/151 (26.5) 0.13
Median follow-up without the endpoint, days (IQR) 20 (13–21) 21 (16–21) 0.01 21 (16–21) 0.56 21 (12.21) 0.55 20 (11–21) 0.87
Scale at day 21 n = 344 n = 88 n = 117 n = 78 n = 151
 1 253 (73.5) 70 (79.5) 80 (68.4) 55 (70.5) 100 (66.2)
 2 10 (2.9) 2 (2.3) 4 (3.4) 2 (2.6) 8 (5.3)
 3 16 (4.7) 8 (9.1) 8 (6.8) 8 (10.3) 14 (9.3)
 4 4 (1.2) 0 0 1 (1.3) 1 (0.7)
 5 19 (5.5) 6 (6.8) 2 (1.7) 4 (5.1) 9 (6.0)
 6 1 (0.3) 0 1 (0.9) 0 19 (6.0)
 7 (death) 41 (11.9) 2 (2.3) 0.004 22 (18.8) 0.08 8 (10.3) 0.84 19 (12.6) 0.88
 Scale ≤3 279 (81.1) 80 (90.9) 0.02 92 (78.6) 0.56 65 (83.3) 0.64 122 (80.8) 0.93
Digestive tract bleeding 2/341 (0.6) 1/88 (1.1) 0.49 1/115 (1.4) 1.0 1/74 (1.4) 0.44 3/150 (2.0) 0.16
Secondary bacterial infection 36/339 (10.3) 11/88 (12.5) 0.57 10/115 (8.7) 0.72 8/75 (10.7) 1.0 18/150 (12.0) 0.64

IQR, interquartile range.

a

For tocilizumab versus no treatment.

b

For corticosteroids, intermediate-high dose versus no treatment.

c

For corticosteroids, pulse dose versus no treatment.

d

For combination versus no treatment.

e

P values obtained by univariate Cox regression except for combination therapy, for which logistic-regression was used.