Table 3.
Estimation of the association of treatments with the primary endpoint (time until intubation or death) and with mortality in the different models. Adjusted models used specific propensity scoresa for receiving each drug
Intubation or death | ||
Tocilizumab versus no treatment | HR (95%CI) | p |
Crude | 0.52 (0.27–1.01) | 0.05 |
With propensity score | 0.32 (0.15–0.67) | 0.003 |
Inverse probability of treatment weights | 0.32 (0.22–0.47) | <0.001 |
Matched cases | 0.42 (0.19–0.92) | 0.03 |
Time-dependent variable with propensity score | 0.36 (0.17–0.75) | 0.007 |
Corticosteroids, intermediate-high dose versus no treatment | OR (95%CI) | p |
Crude | 1.17 (0.71–1.95) | 0.52 |
With propensity score | 0.83 (0.48–1.45) | 0.53 |
Inverse probability of treatment weights | 1.00 (0.72–1.41) | 0.96 |
Matched cases | 0.80 (0.42–1.41) | 0.50 |
Time-dependent variable with propensity score | 0.95 (0.59–1.53) | 0.84 |
Corticosteroids, pulse dose versus no treatment | HR (95%CI) | p |
Crude | 0.71 (0.38–1.32) | 0.28 |
With propensity score | 0.71 (0.36–1.38) | 0.31 |
Inverse probability of treatment weights | 0.61 (0.43–0.86) | 0.006 |
Matched cases | 0.69 (0.32–1.51) | 0.36 |
Time-dependent variable with propensity score | 0.79 (0.41–1.53) | 0.50 |
Combination therapy versus no treatment | OR (95%CI) | p |
Crude | 1.41 (0.90–2.21) | 0.13 |
With propensity score | 1.20 (0.71–2.01) | 0.48 |
Inverse probability of treatment weights | 1.17 (0.86–1.58) | 0.30 |
Matched cases | 1.71 (0.88–3.31) | 0.10 |
Time-dependent variable with propensity score | 1.17 (0.74–1.84) | 0.48 |
DEATH | ||
Tocilizumab versus no treatment | HR (95%CI) | p |
Crude | 0.17 (0.04–0.70) | 0.01 |
With propensity score | 0.12 (0.02–0.56) | 0.007 |
Inverse probability of treatment weights | 0.07 (0.02–0.17) | <0.001 |
Matched cases | 0.22 (0.05–0.96) | 0.04 |
Corticosteroids, intermediate-high dose versus no treatment | HR (95%CI) | p |
Crude | 1.66 (0.99–2.79) | 0.05 |
With propensity score | 1.16 (0.66–2.03) | 0.59 |
Inverse probability of treatment weights | 1.21 (0.62–2.35) | 0.56 |
Matched cases | 1.02 (0.66–1.58) | 0.90 |
Corticosteroids, pulse dose versus no treatment | OR (95%CI) | p |
Crude | 0.80 (0.35–1.81) | 0.59 |
With propensity score | 0.74 (0.31–1.77) | 0.51 |
Inverse probability of treatment weights | 0.64 (0.24–1.04) | 0.06 |
Matched cases | 0.67 (0.24–1.84) | 0.43 |
Combination therapy versus no treatment | OR (95%CI) | p |
Crude | 1.03 (0.57–1.85) | 0.90 |
With propensity score | 1.31 (0.67–2.54) | 0.42 |
Inverse probability of treatment weights | 1.17 (0.75–1.64) | 0.57 |
Matched cases | 1.36 (0.58–3.21) | 0.47 |
Propensity scores were calculated including age, gender, ethnicity, comorbidities (cardiac disease, hypertension, chronic pulmonary disease, chronic renal disease, liver cirrhosis, malignancy, diabetes mellitus, obesity, HIV infection), laboratory data (lymphocytes, lactate dehydrogenase, alanine aminotransferase, ferritin, D-dimers, IL-6), previous treatments, radiographic findings, 7-point scale and type of oxygen requirement. Their predictive ability for observed data are 0.79 (95%CI: 0.74–0.85) for tocilizumab, 0.72 (0.68–0.77) for corticosteroids, intermediate-high dose, 0.77 (0.71–0.82) for corticosteroids, pulse dose, and 0.81 (0.77–0.85) for combination therapy.