Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 2;196(9):771–778. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01636-6

Table 4.

Mean biological effective dose (BED) and tumor control probability (TCP) of the lymph nodes in the three patients with different fractionation schedules. Mean values ± standard deviation

Patient I Patient II Patient III
Schedule BED (Gy) TCP (%) BED (Gy) TCP (%) BED (Gy) TCP (%)
50 Gy/25 Fx 55.3 ± 25.2 44.6 ± 31.4 64.8 ± 17.8 57.5 ± 22.9 12.1 ± 19.2 4.4 ± 14.4
42.5 Gy/16 Fx 51.8 ± 24.0* 38.5 ± 28.5* 60.8 ± 17.0* 49.9 ± 21.0* 11.0 ± 17.9* 3.5 ± 12.1*
40 Gy/15 Fx 48.9 ± 22.6* 32.9 ± 25.1* 57.5 ± 16.1* 42.5 ± 18.6* 10.4 ± 16.9* 2.8 ± 10.1*
27 Gy/5 Fx 45.6 ± 22.0* 27.2 ± 22.0* 54.0 ± 15.7* 34.9 ± 16.6* 9.0 ± 15.6* 2.0 ± 8.1*
26 Gy/5 Fx 43.1 ± 20.7* 21.7 ± 18.0* 50.9 ± 14.8* 27.6 ± 13.7* 8.5 ± 14.7* 1.5 ± 6.4*

Fx fraction, BED biological effective dose, TCP tumor control probability, Gy Gray

*significant difference compared to the standard fractionation schedule (p < 0.001)