Table 2.

Demographics of participants by response state.

Demographicsa		Responsive (high threat and high efficacy)	Avoidance (high threat and low efficacy)	Proactive (low threat and high efficacy)	Indifference (low threat and low efficacy)	Combined
Participants, n (%)		6 (25)	6 (25)	6 (25)	6 (25)	24 (100)
Age (years), n (%)
	18-24	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	2 (33)	2 (8)
	25-34	2 (33)	2 (33)	0 (0)	0 (0)	4 (17)
	35-44	1 (17)	2 (33)	0 (0)	0 (0)	3 (13)
	45-54	1 (17)	1 (17)	3 (50)	2 (33)	7 (29)
	55-64	2 (33)	1 (17)	0 (0)	2 (33)	5 (21)
	65-74	0 (0)	0 (0)	2 (33)	0 (0)	2 (8)
	75-84	0 (0)	0 (0)	1 (17)	0 (0)	1 (4)
Gender, n (%)
	Female	4 (67)	3 (50)	4 (67)	6 (100)	17 (71)
	Male	2 (33)	3 (50)	2 (33)	0 (0)	7 (29)
Ethnicity, n (%)
	White	4 (66)	6 (100)	6 (100)	6 (100)	22 (92)
	Black	1 (17)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	1 (4)
	Hispanic	1 (17)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	1 (4)
Education, n (%)
	High school	2 (33)	3 (50)	3 (50)	2 (33)	10 (42)
	College	3 (50)	3 (50)	3 (50)	3 (50)	12 (50)
	Master	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	1 (17)	1 (4)
	Doctorate	1 (17)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	1 (4)

^aResponse state refers to participants’ categorization based on whether they have high/low threat and efficacy perceptions.