Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 26;53:37. doi: 10.1186/s40659-020-00305-3

Table 5.

In vitro performance assessment of adapted and non-adapted regenerants for various physiological parameters

Regenerants/characters NaCl (mM) Photosynthesis rate (µmol/m2/s) Transpiration rate (mmol/m2/s) Stomatal conductance (mmol/m2/s) (gs) Mesophyll conductance (mmol/m2/s) (gm) Internal CO2 (µmol/mol WUE (µmol/mmol
Control 0 6.13 ± 0.80a 1.35 ± 0.233a 37.58 ± 14.13a 44.7 ± 11.4a 142.0 ± 29.9bc 4.60 ± 0.74d
Salt non-adapted (SNA) 100 4.79 ± 0.56bc 0.74 ± 0.111b 26.98 ± 4.32b 33.3 ± 9.2ab 148.1 ± 23.7bc 6.49 ± 0.22 cd
200 3.87 ± 1.46c 0.47 ± 0.210 cd 21.75 ± 6.28bc 19.8 ± 9.6bc 205.7 ± 30.8b 9.87 ± 5.83bc
300 4.24 ± 0.17c 0.34 ± 0.058de 11.15 ± 2.44d 11.6 ± 3.9c 389.9 ± 95.2a 13.03 ± 2.90b
Salt adapted (SA) 100:100 4.48 ± 0.51c 0.69 ± 0.060bc 15.45 ± 2.33 cd 40.0 ± 3.3a 111.9 ± 9.1c 6.53 ± 0.73 cd
200:200 5.65 ± 0.44ab 0.58 ± 0.190bcd 17.90 ± 7.93bcd 41.0 ± 17.4a 160.8 ± 69.0bc 10.37 ± 2.92bc
300:300 4.64 ± 0.46bc 0.21 ± 0.029e 13.35 ± 1.05 cd 32.1 ± 2.4ab 210.7 ± 13.1b 22.55 ± 4.41a

Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability