Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atmos Environ (1994). 2019 Nov 14;222:117130. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117130

Table A1. Assessment of computational speed, difficulty, and accuracy of exposure assessment methods.

The table reports whether for our data analysis the methods were executed in less than a few hours on a standard PC (“Fast”), whether they ranked near the best cross-validation error (“Accurate”), whether they were fit with standard software without many tuning parameters (“Easy”) and whether predictions were paired with measures of uncertainty (“Uncertainty”).

Method Fast Accurate Easy Uncertainty
OLS
IDW
Universal Kriging
Downscaler
Random forests
Support vector regression
Neural networks