Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 27.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2014 Nov 21;42:119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.11.011

Table 3.

Multinomial logistic regression of potential response to graphic health warning labels by latent class (weighted N = 4,125).a

LCC and hookah users
Nonusers, open to smoking
Daily “smokers” Nondaily, light “social smokers”
Nonusers, closed to smoking
Adjusted RRR, Class 1 vs. Class 3 Adjusted RRR, Class 2 vs. Class 3 Adjusted RRR, Class 4 vs. Class 3 Adjusted RRR, Class 5 vs. Class 3
Age (years)
 18-24 2.09 (1.22-3.55) 1.51 (0.82-2.78) Ref. 1.95 (1.24-3.05) 1.59 (1.13-2.22)
 25-34 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Gender
 Male Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Female 0.32 (0.20-0.52) 1.10 (0.63-1.90) Ref. 0.91 (0.61-1.34) 1.23 (0.92-1.63)
Race/ethnicity
 White, non-Hispanic Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Black, non-Hispanic 1.07 (0.47-2.46) 3.97 (1.66-9.50) Ref. 3.01 (1.49-6.05) 1.68 (0.97-2.92)
 Other, non-Hispanic 1.14 (0.33-3.90) 3.73 (1.14-12.24) Ref. 3.15 (1.42-6.97) 2.58 (1.34-4.97)
 Hispanic 2.64 (1.27-5.46) 6.25 (2.85-13.7l) Ref. 3.94 (2.12-7.32) 3.18 (1.91-5.29)
Education
 Less than high school 0.12 (0.05-0.31) 0.39 (0.17-0.89) Ref. 0.21 (0.10-0.41) 0.19 (0.12-0.30)
 High school 0.26 (0.15-0.46) 0.34 (0.16-0.71) Ref. 0.40 (0.25-0.64) 0.30 (0.21-0.41)
 Some college or greater Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Have you heard about or seen new warning labels which include graphic pictures? 0.93 (0.56-1.53) 0.98 (0.53-1.83) Ref. 1.33 (0.87-2.02) 0.76 (0.56-1.02)
Do you think that new warning labels with graphic pictures would make you think about not smoking? 2.35 (1.39-3.97) 1.70 (0.91-3.18) Ref. 1.30 (0.85-1.98) 2.33 (1.71-3.18)
Constant 1.63 (0.74-3.60) 0.14 (0.05-0.35) 0.63 (0.33-1.21) 4.05 (2.48-6.63)

Source: Legacy Young Adult Cohort Study, Wave 2 (January 2012).

a

Bold typeface indicates p < 0.05.