Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 27.
Published in final edited form as: Fem Econ. 2018 Mar 13;24(2):54–76. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2018.1438639

Table 3.

Factors that influence receipt of care (average marginal effects from logit models reported)

Dependent variable: Received care when needed = 1
(1) (2) (3)
Women − 0.037** − 0.032* − 0.028
Age 0.006 0.027** 0.022*
Rural hukou 0.015 0.023 0.024
Rural residence − 0.036* − 0.041** − 0.039*
Education level (base: illiteracy)
 Did not finish primary school − 0.038 − 0.050* − 0.052**
 Finished primary school 0.003 − 0.006 − 0.004
 Finished middle school 0.052* 0.045 0.045
 Finished high school and above 0.016 0.000 − 0.010
No. of children − 0.000 − 0.001 − 0.001
No. of sons 0.014 0.013 0.012
Receives a pension 0.032* 0.027 0.022
Spouse’s health status (base: no spouse)
 Spouse requires care 0.032 0.048
 Spouse does not require care 0.105*** 0.116***
Predicted probability of receiving care
 Male respondent with no spouse 0.744***
 Female respondent with no spouse 0.814***
t-test (p-value) 0.118
 Male respondent, spouse requires care 0.838***
 Female respondent, spouse requires care 0.827***
t-test (p-value) 0.772
 Male respondent, spouse does not need care 0.946***
 Female respondent, spouse does not need care 0.865***
t-test (p-value) 0.000
Log-likelihood − 661.73 − 649.20 − 641.74
Observations 1,694 1,694 1,694

Notes: Sample includes those who have care needs. In Models 1–3, the variable of age squared is controlled; in Model 3, the interaction term of female and spouse’s health status is controlled additionally.

***, **, *

denote statistical significance at the 1, 5, and 10 percent levels, respectively.