Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 2;9(8):e1101–e1108. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.04.008

Table 1.

Pearls and Pitfalls

Contraindications
  • Grade IV osteoarthritis according to Kellgren–Lawrence classification

  • Abnormal lateral plateau slope (>15°)

  • Fixed flexion contracture

  • Substantial recurvatum (>10°)

Pearls
  • Careful 3-dimensional preoperative planning to understand impact of saw cutting plane, hinge position and wedge insertion on medial and lateral tibial plateau slope modification

  • Hardware removal before PSCG positioning to avoid errors

  • The deepest part of the patellar tendon needs to be cleared to create enough space for the anterior bracket of the PSCG

  • Saw-blade marking to avoid posterolateral effraction

  • The most anterior screw of the plate has to be inserted after the graft fixation because of its close position with the tibial tunnel

Advantages
  • Virtual osteotomy performed with 3-dimensional planning, allowing direct understanding of the process

  • Very accurate and reproducible method for frontal and sagittal tibial abnormalities correction

  • Fewer fluoroscopic images taken

  • Intact TT preserving the extensor mechanism and allowing accurate positioning of the osteotomy at the appropriate level

  • PSCG and plate positioning guiding the opening wedge to correction perfection

  • ACL tunnel connected to screw position to avoid conflicts

  • No modification of patellar height

Potential risks and disadvantages
  • Damage to the popliteal vessels and nerves

  • Hinge breakage

  • Delayed union and non-union

  • Infection

  • Hardware removal

  • Longer surgery in our hands (total 2 hours 30) as compared with isolated ACL revision (1 hour) and high tibial osteotomy (1 hour)

  • Long rehabilitation and delayed return to sports activities (12 months)

ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; PSCG, patient-specific cutting guide; TT, tibial tuberosity.