Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;16(8):e1008326. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008326

Fig 3. Efficiency of CRISPR/Cas editing of Bos1 using repair templates with short homology flanks.

Fig 3

(A) Experimental scheme. (B) Results of transformations with RNP (black lines) and without RNP (blue lines) for RT with flank sizes of 0 to 60 bp. (+RNP: n = 4; -RNP: n = 3). The numbers below show fractions of FenR transformants being IprR, indicating targeting efficiencies. The p values by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons (control: 0 bp) post hoc test are indicated. ***p ≤ 0.001. (C) Scheme of Bos1 targeting with different placement of 60 bp homology flanks of RT, resulting in insertion (left) or 2 kb deletion (right). (D) Results of transformations with RNP and two types of RT as shown in (C). n = 5 (IprR); n = 4 (FenR). The p values by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test are indicated. *p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0,01.