. 2020 Aug 17;16(8):e1008137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008137

Table 2. Comparison of in silico predictions of single knockout mutants vs. pooled experimental results for anaerobic growth in minimal media.

		Experimental Results^a
		Growth	No growth	Inconsistent^b	Unavailable^c
Model Predictions	Growth	142 (GG)	50 (GNG)	25 (GI)	16
Model Predictions	No growth	20 (NGG)	167 (NGNG)	24 (NGI)	33

Abbreviations included in the table correspond to the abbreviations used in the text and are defined as the intersection of the categories (e.g., GG stands for model predicts Growth, experimental results indicate Growth).

^a Based on experimental results from Exp. 633 and Exp. 638 in Deutschbauer et al. [26].

^b The growth/no growth phenotypes for these mutants are different in the two experimental datasets.

^c The mutant was not available in the dataset.