Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 29;7(3):359–369. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.02.002

Table 2.

Randomized clinical trials that evaluated an adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Types of treatment Arms No. of patients Improved RFSa Improved OS Ref.
TKI sorafenib vs. placebo 1114 no no 11
muparfostat (PI-88) vs. placebo 519 no 67
peretinoin vs. placebo 377 no 68
IFN IFN-α vs. no treatment, for HBV-related HCC 236 no yes 6
IFNα-2b vs. no treatment, for viral hepatitis-related HCC 268 no no 69
IFNα vs. no treatment, for HCV-related HCC 30 yes 70
IFNα-2b vs. no treatment, 86 no no 21
Chemotherapy Capecitabine vs. no treatment 60 yes no 71
tegafur/uracil vs. no treatment 117 no no 72
tegafur/uracil vs. no treatment 159 no no 73
epirubicin + carmofur vs. no treatment 56 no no 74
Immunotherapy CIK vs. no treatment 230 yes yes 7
autologous dendritic cells vs. no treatment 156 no no 75
CIK vs. no treatment 200 no no 76
CIK 3 courses vs. CIK 6 courses vs. no treatment 127 yes no 77
Autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine vs. no treatment 41 yes yes 78
Adoptive immunotherapy vs. no treatment 150 yes no 79
recombinant interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells + adriamycin vs. adriamycin alone 24 no no 80
Locoregional therapy TACE vs. no treatment 280 yes yes 8
TACE vs. no treatment 250 yes yes 24
TACE vs. no treatment 115 yes yes 81
HAIC vs. no treatment 135 yes 82
epirubicin hydrochloride + TACE vs. no treatment 66 no no 83
pre- and post-operative targeting locoregional chemotherapy-immunotherapy vs. no treatment 36 yes 84
TCM Huaier granule vs. no treatment 1044 yes yes 85
Intravenous Cinobufacini + oral Jiedu granule vs. TACE 364 yes yes 86
Radiotherapy external beam radiotherapy vs. no treatment 119 no no 87
iodine-125 brachytherapy vs. no treatment 68 yes yes 46
intra-arterial iodine-131-lipiodol vs. single unlabeled lipiodol 58 yes no 88
intra-arterial iodine-131-lipiodol vs. no treatment 103 no no 89
intra-arterial iodine-131-lipiodol vs. no treatment 43 yes yes 90,91
Anti-HBV telbivudine vs. no treatment, for serum HBV-DNA < 2000 IU/mL 200 yes yes 18
adefovir vs. no treatment, for serum HBV-DNA > 2000 IU/mL 200 yes yes 9
Lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, or entecavir vs. no treatment, for serum HBV-DNA > 500 copies/mL 163 yes yes 10
Others vitamin K2 analog (menatetrenone) vs. no treatment 101 yes no 92
polyprenoic acid vs. placebo 89 yes 93

RFS, recurrence-free survival; OS, overall survival; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; TCM, traditional Chinese medicine; TACE, transcatheter chemoembolization; CIK, chemokine-induced killer cells.

a

If RFS was not reported, recurrence rate or time to recurrence were evaluated.