Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 8;104(8):3327–3336. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-02414

Table 1.

Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Subjects

No NAFLD (N = 41) No NASH (N = 52) NASH (N = 94) P (by ANOVA)
Age, y 55 ± 11 48 ± 10a 50 ± 11a 0.01
Male, n (%) 28 (68) 38 (73) 69 (73) 0.82
BMI, kg/m2 32.1 ± 3.8 33.8 ± 4.4 34.8 ± 4.8a 0.005
Total body fat by DXA, % of body weight) 31 ± 7 33 ± 7 33 ± 7 0.56
Visceral fat by MRI, cm2 139 ± 51 163 ± 43 187 ± 63a <0.001
Liver fat by 1H-MRS, % 3 ± 1 15 ± 8a 18 ± 9a <0.001
Patients with T2DM, n (%) 21 (51) 28 (54) 51 (54) 0.95
Fasting glucose, mg/dL 116 ± 25 118 ± 22 123 ± 27 0.26
Plasma insulin, µU/mL 8 ± 7 13 ± 10a 16 ± 12a <0.001
A1C, % 6.2 ± 1.1 6.3 ± 1.0 6.4 ± 1.0 0.54
Cholesterol, mg/dL 161 ± 35 171 ± 49 187 ± 45a 0.006
Triglycerides, mg/dL 116 ± 52 148 ± 73 206 ± 144a,b <0.001
LDL, mg/dL 95 ± 27 105 ± 44 110 ± 41 0.14
HDL, mg/dL 43 ± 12 38 ± 7a 37 ± 8a 0.001
ALT, IU/L 33 ± 27 47 ± 23 72 ± 39a,b <0.001
AST, IU/L 29 ± 17 32 ± 12 51 ± 28a,b <0.001
Cytokeratin-18, U/L 188 ± 186 228 ± 204 403 ± 293a,b <0.001
Adiponectin, μg/dL 10.7 ± 6.0 7.8 ± 4.5 8.6 ± 6.5 0.07
hsCRP, mg/L 7.2 ± 8.6 6.6 ± 6.5 7.4 ± 7.2 0.98

Data are shown as mean ± SD for continuous variables and as number (%) for categorical variables. P values represent the comparison between all groups by ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Post hoc comparisons between two groups were performed adjusting for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni method.

Abbreviations: HDL, high-density lipoprotein; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

a

P < 0.05 compared with the No NAFLD group.

b

P < 0.05 compared with the No NASH group.