Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 19;2020:1876080. doi: 10.1155/2020/1876080

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of included studies.

Study Sample size (T/C) Male (T/C) Mean age (T/C) Cardiac function (T/C) Interventions in both Yiqi Fumai injection and control group Dose of Yiqi Fumai injection Treatment period (weeks) Outcomes
NYHA II NYHA III NYHA IV
Aunt and Nurbia [15] 60/60 55.4 (total) Furosemide, metoprolol 5.2 g 2 a, b, f
Diao [16] 43/43 22/21 60.3/60.5 Spironolactone, digoxin 4 b
Dong and Liu [17] 60/60 38/35 56.4/56.1 Enalapril, metoprolol 5.2 g 2 a, b, e
Feng [18] 27/24 56.0∼86.0 12/10 12/12 3/2 Spironolactone, metoprolol 5.2 g b, d
Li [19] 30/30 14/17 67.5/64.7 16/18 14/12 Furosemide, metoprolol 1.3 g 2 b
Li et al. [20] 30/30 15/15 71.1/70.9 Ramipril, furosemide 5.2 g 1.5 e, f
Li [21] 30/30 64.3 (total) Furosemide, captopril 2.6 g 4 b, f, g
Li et al. [22] 59/59 35/34 68.5/68.3 Atorvastatin 5.2 g 2 b, e, h
Liu [23] 45/45 24/25 56.7/55.2 / 19/18 26/27 Dobutamine hydrochloride 5.2 g 2 b, e, d, h
Lv [24] 43/40 30/28 62.7/61.5 17/16 14/13 12/11 Furosemide, metoprolol 2.6 g 2 h
Mao and Song [25] 30/30 17/18 58.5/58.6 Spironolactone, metoprolol 2.6 g 2 b, e
Ren [26] 44/44 55.0 (total) Trimetazidine 5.2 g 2 b, e, h
Sun [27] 30/30 11/10 76.0/74.0 6/5 15/17 9/8 Enalapril, metoprolol 3.9 g 2 a, b, e, f, c, g
Sun [28] 60/60 43/44 58.4/58.2 16/17 26/27 18/16 Captopril, metoprolol 5.2 g 2 b, e, h
Wang and He [29] 35/29 19/16 54.9/52.5 9/7 20/18 6/4 Furosemide, digoxin 3.9 g 2 b, c, d, h
Wang [30] 50/50 32/30 70.0/69.5 Aspirin, spironolactone 5.2 g 2 b, e, h
Wang et al. [31] 33/32 19/18 64.3/63.8 Milrinone 5.2 g 1 a, b, e, c
Wang [32] 49/49 32/33 76.0/79.0 Metoprololsuccinate 5.2 g 2 b
Wang and Niu [33] 35/35 21/22 58.0/59.0 10/10 18/19 7/6 Isosorbide dinitrate 3.9 g 2 b, c, h
Wu [34] 32/30 19/17 60.3/62.4 Enalapril 2.1 g 2 b, c
Xi [35] 79/79 39/36 56.0/56.0 Amiodarone, furosemide 2.6 g 2 a
Xue et al. [13] 44/43 28/25 55.3/55.5 7/6 28/28 9/9 Captopril, metoprolol 2.6 g 2 a, b
Yang and Liu [36] 60/60 72.2/73.1 6/8 54/52 Enalapril, metoprolol 5.8 g 2 b, e
Yang [37] 150/150 89/87 57.2/56.4 29/28 96/97 25/25 Captopril, digoxin 5.2 g 2 b, e, f, h
Yang et al. [38] 30/30 22/23 70.7/70.8 8/5 18/18 4/7 Enalapril, metoprolol 5.2 g 2 b, e
Yang [39] 30/30 16/15 69.0/67.8 6/6 16/18 8/7 Furosemide, metoprolol 2.6 g 2 a
Yu and Wang [40] 30/30 15/16 66.0/65.0 6/6 21/20 3/4 Furosemide, spironolactone 3.9 g 2 b, h
Yu et al. [11] 45/45 25/23 51.5/52.0 Spironolactone, metoprolol 2.6 g 2 a, b
Zhai and Hui [12] 30/30 63.0 (total) 20 36 4 Ramipril, furosemide 5.2 g 2 a, b, e, h
Zhang [41] 30/30 70.0 (total) 26 20 14 Enalapril, metoprolol 5.2 g 2 a, b, e, f, h
Zhang [10] 40/40 23/24 56.3/55.9 Furosemide, captopril 3.9 g 2 a, b, e
Zhu [42] 100/100 66/66 63.7/63.2 Atorvastatin 5.2 g 2 b, d, h
Zhu and Han [43] 50/50 31/28 66.2/69.0 Aspirin, spironolactone 5.2 g 2 a, b, c, d, g

Notes. Both groups received the same basic treatment; “—” = not reported; T = trial group; C = control group; NYHA = New York Heart Association. Outcomes: a = response rate; b = left ventricular ejection fraction; c = cardiac output; d = left ventricular end-systolic diameter; e = N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; f = 6-minute walk test; g = quality of life; h = adverse reaction.