Table 3:
SAP N=77 | E-N N=77 | 24–7 N=77 | P-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent time <3.9mmol/L /dL | Overall | 4.0±3.3 | 2.3±1.7 | 1.8±1.4 | <0.0001* |
Group A: | 3.3±2.2 | 2.1±1.6 | 1.7±1.4 | P=0.019† | |
Group B: | 4.9±3.9 | 2.6±1.9 | 2.0±1.4 | ||
Percent time in 3.9–10mmol/L | Overall | 58.6±14.6 | 67.6±12.9 | 69.5±10.9 | <0.0001* |
Group A: | 59.0±13.1 | 69.3±10.4 | 69.4±9.8 | p=0.68† | |
Group B: | 58.3±16.2 | 65.9±14.9 | 69.6±12.1 | ||
Percent time <3mmol/L | Overall | 1.11±1.34 | 0.51±0.51 | 0.41±0.41 | <0.0001* |
Group A: | 0.70±0.54 | 0.40±0.39 | 0.37±0.41 | p=0.0040† | |
Group B: | 1.54±1.74 | 0.63±0.60 | 0.47±0.42 | ||
Percent time >10mmol/L | Overall | 37.4±16.5 | 30.1±13.7 | 28.7±11.4 | <0.0001* |
Group | 37.9±14.1 | 28.7±10.8 | 28.9±10.0 | p=0.78† | |
Group B: | 36.9±18.7 | 31.5±16.2 | 28.5±12.8 | ||
Percent time >13.3mmol/L | Overall | 12.6±10.5 | 8.6±7.5 | 7.3±5.9 | <0.0001* |
Group A: | 12.2±9.3 | 7.6±5.9 | 7.3±5.5 | p=0.59† | |
Group B: | 13.0±11.7 | 9.6±8.8 | 7.4±6.4 | ||
Average CGM [mmol/L] | Overall | 9.30±1.58 | 8.82±1.22 | 8.74±0.99 | <0.0001* |
Group A: | 9.36±1.38 | 8.70±0.96 | 8.75±0.88 | p=0.63† | |
Group B: | 9.23±1.78 | 8.95±1.44 | 8.72±1.11 | ||
Coefficient of Variation [%] | Overall | 37.8±4.5 | 35.3±4.2 | 34.3±4.0 | <0.0001* |
Group A: | 37.2±4.0 | 35.3±4.4 | 34.6±4.5 | p=0.082† | |
Group B: | 38.5±5.4 | 35.4±3.9 | 34.0±3.6 | ||
Low Blood Glucose Index | Overall | 1.04±0.79 | 0.66±0.42 | 0.57±0.34 | <0.0001* |
Group A: | 0.84±0.54 | 0.61±0.37 | 0.53±0.33 | p=0.020† | |
Group B: | 1.24±0.95 | 0.72±0.48 | 0.60±0.35 | ||
High Blood Glucose Index | Overall | 8.82±4.61 | 6.97±3.52 | 6.53±2.86 | <0.0001* |
Group A: | 8.85±4.12 | 6.54±2.74 | 6.55±2.59 | p=0.99† | |
Group B: | 8.80±5.12 | 7.41±4.16 | 6.51±3.16 |
Comparison of SAP vs E-N CLC vs 24–7 CLC
Linear contrast of treatment escalation SAP → E-N CLC → 24–7 CLC (Group A) vs treatment de-escalation 24–7 CLC → E-N CLC → SAP (Group B).