Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jan 3;2(2):e64–e73. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30218-3

Table 3:

Overall outcomes on SAP, E-N CLC and 24–7CLC, and influence of the order of treatment introduction SAP → E-N CLC → 24–7 CLC (Group A N=39), or in reverse (Group B N=38).

SAP N=77 E-N N=77 24–7 N=77 P-Value
 Percent time <3.9mmol/L /dL Overall 4.0±3.3 2.3±1.7 1.8±1.4 <0.0001*
Group A: 3.3±2.2 2.1±1.6  1.7±1.4  P=0.019
Group B: 4.9±3.9 2.6±1.9  2.0±1.4
 Percent time in 3.9–10mmol/L Overall 58.6±14.6 67.6±12.9 69.5±10.9 <0.0001*
Group A: 59.0±13.1 69.3±10.4  69.4±9.8  p=0.68
Group B: 58.3±16.2 65.9±14.9  69.6±12.1
 Percent time <3mmol/L Overall 1.11±1.34 0.51±0.51 0.41±0.41 <0.0001*
Group A: 0.70±0.54 0.40±0.39  0.37±0.41  p=0.0040
Group B: 1.54±1.74 0.63±0.60  0.47±0.42
 Percent time >10mmol/L Overall 37.4±16.5 30.1±13.7 28.7±11.4 <0.0001*
Group 37.9±14.1 28.7±10.8  28.9±10.0  p=0.78
Group B: 36.9±18.7 31.5±16.2  28.5±12.8
 Percent time >13.3mmol/L Overall 12.6±10.5 8.6±7.5 7.3±5.9 <0.0001*
Group A: 12.2±9.3  7.6±5.9  7.3±5.5  p=0.59
Group B:  13.0±11.7 9.6±8.8  7.4±6.4
 Average CGM [mmol/L] Overall 9.30±1.58 8.82±1.22 8.74±0.99 <0.0001*
Group A: 9.36±1.38 8.70±0.96  8.75±0.88  p=0.63
Group B: 9.23±1.78 8.95±1.44  8.72±1.11
 Coefficient of Variation [%] Overall 37.8±4.5 35.3±4.2 34.3±4.0 <0.0001*
Group A: 37.2±4.0 35.3±4.4  34.6±4.5  p=0.082
Group B: 38.5±5.4 35.4±3.9  34.0±3.6
 Low Blood Glucose Index Overall 1.04±0.79 0.66±0.42 0.57±0.34 <0.0001*
Group A: 0.84±0.54 0.61±0.37  0.53±0.33  p=0.020
Group B: 1.24±0.95 0.72±0.48  0.60±0.35
 High Blood Glucose Index Overall 8.82±4.61 6.97±3.52 6.53±2.86 <0.0001*
Group A: 8.85±4.12 6.54±2.74  6.55±2.59  p=0.99
Group B: 8.80±5.12 7.41±4.16  6.51±3.16
*

Comparison of SAP vs E-N CLC vs 24–7 CLC

Linear contrast of treatment escalation SAP → E-N CLC → 24–7 CLC (Group A) vs treatment de-escalation 24–7 CLC → E-N CLC → SAP (Group B).