Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2020 Mar 14;125(11):1644–1650. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.041

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in observational studies on left atrial appendage occlusion that reported observed versus expected bleeding events

Baseline characteristics n (%), Mean ± SD
Total number of studies 26
Total number of patients 10,056
Age (years) 74.0 ± 8.7
Men 6,029 (60%)
Type of atrial fibrillation
 Paroxysmal 1,495 (15%)
 Nonparoxysmal 8,561 (85%)
Hypertension 6,825 (68%)
Diabetes mellitus 2,397 (24%)
Prior stroke/transient ischemic attack 3,135 (31%)
Peripheral vascular disease 868 (9%)
Congestive heart failure 1,628(16%)
Mean CHA2DS2-VASc Score 4.21±1.48
Mean HASBLED Score 3.08±1.14
Left appendage occlusion device
 Watchman 4,634 (46%)
 Amplatzer cardiac plug 2,350 (23%)
Amulet 1,787(18%)
 Amplatzer cardiac plug /amulet 1,285 (13%)
Procedural success 9,801 (97%)
Antithrombotic therapy at discharge
 Oral anticoagulant 1,805 (18%)
 Warfarin 717 (40%)
 Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant 450 (25%)
 Not specified (Warfarin/NOAC) 638 (35%)
 Antiplatelet 6,942 (69%)
 Dual antiplatlets 4,955 (71%)
 Single antiplatelet 1,091 (16%)
 Not specified (SAPT/DAPT) 896 (13%)
 Not reported/none/other 1,317(13%)

DAPT = dual anti-platelet therapy; NOAC = nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; SAPT = single anti-platelet therapy.