Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 27;10(8):e034626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034626

Table 1.

Studies included in the multiple-treatment meta-analysis

Study Patients (n) Age (years) median (range) Sex (% male) Favourable MSKCC (%) Intermediate Poor Median PFS in months (95% CI) HR (95% CI)
Motzer et al39 (RECORD-3)
 Everolimus 238 62 (20–89) 69.7 29 56 15 7.9 1.4 (1.2 to 1.8)
 Sunitinib 238 62 (29–84) 73.9 30 56 14 10.7 1 (Ref)
Motzer et al43 (COMPARZ)
 Pazopanib 557 61 (18–88) 71 27 58 12 8.4 (8.3 to 10.9) 1.05 (0.90 to 1.22)
 Sunitinib 553 62 (23–86) 75 27 59 9 9.5 (8.3 to 11.1) 1 (Ref)
Rini et al38 (INTORACT)
 Temsirolimus plus bevacizumab 400 59 (22–87) 72 28 65 8 9.1 (8.1 to 10.2) 1.1 (0.9 to 1.3)
 Bevacizumab plus IFN-α 391 58 (23–81) 69 27 65 8 9.3 (9.0 to 11.2) 1 (Ref)
Procopio et al42 (ROSORC)
 Sorafenib plus interleukin-2 66 64 (57–69)* 79 55 41 5 NA NA
 Sorafenib 62 62 (52–69)* 69 55 39 6 NA NA
Hutson et al12
 Axitinib 192 58 (23–83) 70 49 44 4 10.1 (7.2 to 12.1) 0.77 (0.56 to 1.05)
 Sorafenib 96 58 (20–77) 77 55 42 2 6.5 (4.7 to 8.3) 1 (Ref)
Motzer et al13
 Tivozanib 260; treatment naive 181 59 (23–83) 71 27 67 7 12.7 (9.1 to 15.0) 0.756 (0.580 to 0.985)
 Sorafenib 257; treatment naive 181 59 (23–85) 74 34 62 4 9.1 (7.3 to 10.8) 1 (Ref)
Sternberg et al11 (VEG105192)
 Pazopanib 290; treatment naive 155 59 (28–82) 68 36 56 4 11.1 0.40 (0.27 to 0.60)
 Placebo n=145; treatment naive 78 62 (25–81) 74 40 51 6 2.8 1 (Ref)
Motzer et al36
 Sunitinib 375 62 (27–87) 71 38 56 6 11 (11 to 13) 0.539 (0.451 to 0.643)
 IFN-α 375 59 (34–85) 72 34 59 7 5 (4 to 6) 1 (Ref)
Negrier et al10 (TARGET)
 Sorafenib 451; treatment naive 77 60 63.6 53.2 46.8 0 5.8 0.48 (0.32 to 0.73)
 Placebo 452; treatment naive 84 60.5 69 45.2 54.8 0 2.8 1 (Ref)
Rini et al35 (CALGB 90206)
 Bevacizumab plus IFN-α 369 61 (56–70) 73 26 64 10 8.5 (7.5 to 9.7) 0.71 (0.61 to 0.83)
 IFN-α 363 62 (55–70) 66 26 64 10 5.2 (3.1 to 5.6) 1 (Ref)
Escudier et al34 (AVOREN)
 Bevacizumab plus IFN-α 327 61 (30–82) 68 27 56 9 10.2 0.61 (0.51 to 0.73)
 IFN-α 322 60 (18–81) 73 29 56 8 5.4 1 (Ref)
Motzer et al16 (CheckMate 214)
 Nivolumab plus ipilimumab 550 62 (26–85) 75 23 61 17 11.6 (8.7 to 15.5) 0.82 (0.64 to 1.05)†
 Sunitinib 546 62 (21–85) 72 23 61 16 8.4 (7.0 to 10.8) 1 (Ref)
Choueiri et al15
 Cabozantinib 79 63 (40–82) 83.5 0 81.0‡ 19.0‡ 8.2 (6.2 to 8.8) 0.66 (0.46 to 0.95)
 Sunitinib 78 64 (31–87) 73.1 0 80.8‡ 19.2‡ 5.6 (3.4 to 8.1) 1 (Ref)
Motzer et al41 (JAVELIN Renal 101)
 Avelumab plus axitinib 442 62 (29–83) 71.5 21.7 64 11.5 13.8 (11.1-NE) 0.69 (0.56 to 0.84)
 Sunitinib 444 61 (27–88) 77.5 22.5 66 10.1 8.4 (6.9 to 11.1) 1 (Ref)
Rini et al40 (KEYNOTE-426)
 Pembrolizumab and axitinib 432 62 (30–89) 71.3 31.9‡ 55.1‡ 13‡ 15.1 (12.6 to 17.7) 0.69 (0.57 to 0.84)
 Sunitinib 429 61 (26–90) 74.6 30.5‡ 57.3‡ 12.1‡ 11.1 (8.7 to 12.5) 1 (Ref)

RECORD-3, COMPARZ, INTORACT, ROSORC, TARGET, CALGB, AVOREN, JAVELIN, and KEYNOTE are names of the trials.

NE denotes could not be estimated.

*IQR.

†99.1% CI.

‡International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group.

CALGB, Cancer and Leukemia Group B; IFN-α, interferon-α; INTORACT, Investigation of Torisel and Avastin Combination Therapy trial; MSKCC, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; NA, not available; PFS, progression-free survival; RECORD, Renal Cell Cancer Treatment With Oral RAD001 Given Daily; Ref, reference group (hence HR set to 1); TARGET, Treatment Approaches in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial.