Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 7;69(31):1020–1022. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6931a3

TABLE. Demographic, clinical, household, community and occupational characteristics of 241 meat processing facility workers with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection — Nebraska, April–May 2020.

Characteristic (no. with available information) No. (%)*
Sex (237)
Male
136 (57)
Female
101 (43)
Age group, yrs (238)
Median age, yrs (range)
41 (18–76)
18–29
41 (17)
30–39
70 (29)
40–49
44 (18)
50–59
55 (23)
≥60
28 (12)
Ethnicity (210)
Hispanic
97 (46)
Non-Hispanic
113 (54)
Reported preferred language (220)
Spanish
75 (34)
English
56 (25)
Somali
54 (25)
Other
35 (16)
Underlying health conditions (238)
None
195 (82)
Any§
43 (18)
Diabetes
21 (9)
Cardiovascular disease
15 (6)
Lung disease
8 (3)
Signs and symptoms associated with illness (241)
None
78 (32)
Any
163 (68)
Headache
106 (44)
Fatigue
85 (35)
Measured or subjective fever
82 (34)
Myalgia
82 (34)
Lost taste or smell
77 (32)
Cough
59 (24)
Sore throat
57 (24)
Chills
52 (22)
Median illness duration, days (range)
11 (<1–31)
Outcome (241)
Hospitalized
2 (1)
Died
0 (0)
Smoking habits (236)
Never smoker
177 (75)
Former smoker
46 (19)
Current smoker
13 (6)
Occupational exposures
Close contact** with ill person at work (241), no. (% of total)
70 (29)
Production areas, no. (% of 70)
52 (74)
Cafeteria/Break areas, no. (% of 70)
36 (51)
Locker room, no. (% of 70)
30 (43)
Entry/Exit, no. (% of 70)
28 (40)
Other, no. (% of 70)
12 (17)
Worked 2 wks before symptoms or test†† (237)
167 (68)
Occupational role§§ (167)
Harvesting (stunning, slaughtering, eviscerating, halving)¶¶
27 (16)
Chilling
12 (7)
Processing (cutting, preparing and packaging meat products)¶¶
91 (54)
Rendering (converting waste animal materials into usable products)¶¶
3 (2)
Material handling
21 (13)
Administrative support/Other
16 (10)
Commute to work*** (167)
Carpool
19 (11)
Private car
147 (88)
Other
5 (3)
Wore a face covering or mask at work (157)
Always
142 (90)
Sometimes
8 (5)
Never
7 (4)
Aware of flexible leave policy (164)
Yes
120 (73)
No
18 (11)
Don’t know
26 (16)
Temperature checked at work entry (160)
Always
139 (87)
Sometimes
9 (6)
Never
12 (8)
Symptoms checked at work entry (162)
Always
66 (41)
Sometimes
17 (10)
Never
79 (49)
Household and community characteristics
Household size, no. of persons including interviewed worker (228)
Median (range)
3 (1–13)
1
38 (17)
2
63 (28)
3
46 (20)
4
36 (16)
5
22 (10)
≥6
23 (10)
Home type (233)
Single-family home
124 (53)
Apartment
99 (42)
Mobile home or other
10 (4)
Household member works outside home (234)
No one else worked outside home
119 (51)
Household member works outside home†††
115 (49)
   Same facility, no. (% of 115)
83 (72)
   Other food or manufacturing facility, no. (% of 115)
11 (10)
   Health care, long-term care facility, school, or child care, no. (% of 115)
9 (8)
   Other, no. (% of 115)
18 (16)
Household member ill or has positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 (236)
Household member ill or has positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 before or after worker
63 (27)
Community exposures
Close contact†† with ill person outside work, including ill household members (235)
30 (13)
Not sure about close contact with ill person outside work (235)
22 (9)
Used public or shared transportation (236)
12 (5)
Household member at school or child care facility (238)
3 (1)
Attended social gathering of >10 persons (234) 3 (1)

* Because of missing data, categories might not sum to total.

Information on preferred language was included instead of race because more complete and detailed information was available for this diverse population. Other languages include Burmese, Cambodian, French, Karen, Lao, Malay, Oromo, Romanian, Tigrinya, and Vietnamese.

§ Other underlying conditions that were asked about and reported infrequently include: renal conditions, liver conditions, autoimmune disorders, neurologic disorders and other chronic conditions.

Six workers reported underlying cardiovascular disease and diabetes.

** Close contact was defined as being within 6 ft (2 m) of an ill person for ≥10 minutes in the 2 weeks preceding symptom onset or testing.

†† No information is available on why the workers who did not go to work in the 14-day period were absent.

§§ Six workers had multiple occupational roles.

¶¶ Those working on the belt in harvesting, processing, and rendering were considered to work in proximity (<4 ft [<1.5 m]) to one another.

*** Four workers used multiple modes of transportation to get to work.

††† Six workers had two household members who worked outside the home in different industries. It is possible that multiple household members who worked in the same plant are included in this study.