Table 2.
Cluster anatomy (manual labeling) | Cluster size | FWE p (cluster level) | Peak z score | Peak coordinates (MNI; mm) | Peak label (AAL) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat probability; negative linear effect | |||||
L middle frontal gyrus (dlPFC) | 14 | 0.049 | 4.02 | −33, 45, 30 | Frontal_Mid_L |
L putamen; L insula (anterior short gyrus) | 17 | 0.015 | 3.97; 3.80 | −20, 15, −3; −30, 18, −8 | Putamen_L; Insula_L |
R cerebellum | 25 | 0.015 | 4.23 | 44, −47, −33 | Cerebelum_Crus1_R |
Threat magnitude; negative linear effect | |||||
L anterior limb of internal capsule/putamen | 36 | <0.001 | 4.41 | −23, 15, 8 | Putamen_L |
L insula (posterior short gyrus) | 16 | 0.042 | 4.29 | −36, −2, 6 | NA |
R inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part (vIPFC) | 16 | 0.042 | 4.28 | 42, 9, 27 | Frontal_Inf_Oper_R |
R cerebellum | 784 | <0.001 | 4.76 | 33, −53, −23 | Cerebelum_6_R |
82 | <0.001 | 4.50 | 18, −47, −18 | Cerebelum_4_5_R | |
56 | <0.001 | 4.30 | 26, −62, −57 | Cerebelum_8_R | |
59 | <0.001 | 4.12 | 9, −72, −26 | Cerebelum_6_R | |
53 | <0.001 | 4.08 | 15, −66, −45 | Cerebelum_8_R | |
34 | <0.001 | 3.92 | 29, −66, −27 | Cerebelum_6_R | |
L cerebellum | 33 | <0.001 | 3.93 | −30, −51, −23 | Cerebelum_6_L |
16 | 0.008 | 3.67 | −35, −63, −26 | Cerebelum_6_L | |
Cerebellar vermis | 18 | 0.021 | 3.76 | −3, −59, −32 | Vermis_9 |
L inferior temporal gyrus | 17 | 0.030 | 3.88 | −51, −62, −20 | Temporal_Inf_L |
Threat probability × magnitude; positive linear effect | |||||
L entorhinal cortex; L presubiculum and parasubiculum extending into CA1 (of aHC) | 14 | 0.043 | 3.50 | −16, −9, −27 | ParaHippocampal_L |
12 | 0.002 (SVC) | 3.50; 3.29 | −17, −9, −27; −18, −14, −21 | ParaHippocampal_L Hippocampus_L |
Parametric modulating effects of threat probability, magnitude and their interaction on brain activation (Analysis P1). FWE-corrected results (p < .05) at cluster level (whole-brain + whole-brain/small volume corrected (SVC) for hippocampus), at a voxel-inclusion level inclusion threshold of p < 0.001. Manual labeling in comparison with schematic brain atlas (Mai et al., 2016). Automated labeling shows AAL (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002) peak labels verbatim.