Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;33(8):doaa021. doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa021

Table 5.

Laparoscopy-assisted hybrid minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

No of studies No of patients RR/SMD (95% CI) I 2 (%)
Pneumonia (RR) 4 297 1.83 (0.71–4.71) 32
Pulmonary complications (RR) 4 298 1.45 (0.98–2.15) 4
Anastomotic leakage (RR) 7 723 0.55 (0.38–0.80) 0
Chyle leakage (RR) 4 177 1.05 (0.21–5.28) 0
RLN palsy (RR) 2 197 4.18 (0.52–33.57) 0
Wound infection (RR) 2 187 7.33 (1.39–38.61) 0
Severe complications (RR) 2 197 0.85 (0.57–1.27) 0
All complications (RR) 2 197 1.02 (0.79–1.32) 0
Reoperation (RR) 3 238 2.21 (0.44–11.06 0
Postoperative mortality (RR) 5 323 0.85 (0.17–4.19) 0
Irradical resection (RR) 4 298 1.63 (0.39–6.73) 0
Intensive care LOS (SMD) 2 110 0.45 (−0.77–1.67) 89
Hospital LOS (SMD) 4 273 −0.05 (−0.31–0.21) 9
Extracted lymph nodes (SMD) 4 273 0.17 (−0.09–0.42) 6
Operating time (SMD) 4 273 −0.47 (−0.72-0.23) 0
Blood loss (SMD) 2 197 0.66 (0.36–0.95 0

RR, relative risk; SMD, standardized mean difference; CI, confidence interval. For dichotomous parameters, RR > 1 favors TMIE and RR < 1 favors HMIE. For continuous parameters, SMD >0 favors TMIE and SMD <0 favors HMIE, except for the parameter ‘Extracted lymph nodes’, in which SMD >0 favors HMIE and SMD <0 favors TMIE