Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 28;20(10):50. doi: 10.1007/s11892-020-01335-7

Table 3.

Studies assessing the relationship of FGF23 with outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes

Author N Follow-up (years) Age (years) eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) FGF23 (RU/mL) Outcome: hazard ratio (95% CI)#
Silva et al. [51] 107 2.8 ± 0.7 57.2 ± 7.1 52.89 ± 20.15 135.0 ± 135.2 CV mortality: 2.05 (1.01–8.25)
Titan et al. [52] 55 2.6 ± 0.8 58.4 ± 10.0 53.0 ± 20.6 92.0 ± 42.9 Composite endpoint1: 1.09 (1.01–1.16)
Tuñón et al. [15•] 173 2.15 ± 0.99 62.8 73.75 ± 20.84 72.2 (56.7–104.9) Composite endpoint2: 1.27 (1.13–1.43)
Yeung et al. [20••] 310 5.8 (3.3–6.5) 61.5 ± 8.7 88.5 ± 14.8 84.2 (67.0–117.6)

All-cause mortality: 2.55 (1.58–4.10)

MACE: 1.68 (1.08–2.61)

Frimodt et al. [53] 200 6.1 (5.9–6.6) 59.9 ± 9 91.1 ± 18.3 71 (52–108) All-cause mortality: 1.57 (1.11–2.18)
Chan et al. [54] 513 6.6 (5.8–7.5) 55.0 (49.0–62.0) 91.3 (76.4–111.3) 112.4 (79.0–165.8) All-cause mortality: 1.74 (1.44–2.09)

1Composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, doubling of serum creatinine or requirement for dialysis

2Composite endpoint of acute ischemic events (acute coronary syndrome, stroke or transient ischemic attack), heart failure or death

#Adjusted for potential confounders

Abbreviations: eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, FGF23 fibroblast growth factor 23, CI confidence interval, CV cardiovascular, MACE major adverse cardiac event