TABLE 4.
Pressure data, mm Hg | |||||
PCWP mean | 14 ± 5* | 32 ± 6 | 32 ± 6 | 32 ± 5 | <0.0001 |
Peak a-wave | 18 ± 5* | 36 ± 9 | 35 ± 8 | – | <0.0001 |
Nadir x-descent | 12 ± 5* | 28 ± 8 | 27 ± 6 | 29 ± 6 | <0.0001 |
Peak v-wave | 21 ± 8* | 47 ± 13 | 51 ± 14 | 52 ± 13 | <0.0001 |
Nadir y-descent | 13 ± 5* | 29 ± 8 | 27 ± 7 | 28 ± 5 | <0.0001 |
RA mean | 7 ± 4* | 18 ± 7 | 19 ± 7 | 23 ± 9† | <0.0001 |
PA mean | 26 ± 8* | 45 ± 11 | 47 ± 11 | 48 ± 9 | <0.0001 |
PA systolic | 42 ± 13* | 63 ± 16 | 67 ± 17 | 69 ± 12 | <0.0001 |
RA/PCWP | 0.50 ± 0.25 | 0.56 ± 0.17 | 0.59 ± 0.22 | 0.71 ± 0.22†‡ | <0.0001 |
LVTMP | 7 ± 4†§ | 14 ± 6‡∥ | 14 ± 8 | 9 ± 7†§ | <0.0001 |
o2 transport | |||||
Vo2, ml/min | 933 ± 323* | 819 ± 266 | 756 ± 233 | 745 ± 252 | 0.0006 |
Vo2, ml/min/kg | 11.7 ± 4.2* | 9.0 ± 3.1 | 8.3 ± 2.2 | 8.6 ± 3.1 | <0.0001 |
AVo2diff, ml/dl | 9.2 ± 2.0 | 9.3 ± 2.1 | 10.0 ± 2.2 | 11.1 ± 2.0†‡ | <0.0001 |
HR, beats/min | 117 ± 25* | 101 ±17‡§ | 92 ± 15 | 94 ± 21 | <0.0001 |
CO, l/min | 10.3 ± 3.8* | 9.2 ± 2.9* | 7.7 ± 2.7 | 6.5 ± 2.4 | <0.0001 |
ΔCO/ΔVo2, ml/ml | 6.8 (5.0–7.9)* | 5.9 (4.2–6.8) | 4.7 (2.9–7.4) | 4.4 (2.0–5.1)†‡ | <0.0001 |
CO, % predicted | 113 (83–131)* | 99 (69–114) | 79 (49–123) | 73 (33–85)†‡ | <0.0001 |
SV, ml | 89 ± 32 | 91 ± 29 | 86 ± 33 | 71 ± 28†‡ | 0.002 |
SVI, ml/m2 | 46 ± 14 | 45 ± 12 | 42 ± 13 | 36 ± 14†‡ | 0.0002 |
CI, l/min*m2 | 5.4 ± 1.9* | 4.6 ± 1.3* | 3.8 ± 1.1 | 3.2 ± 1.1 | <0.0001 |
Afterload | |||||
PVR, dynes/s/cm−5 | 105 ± 74 | 134 ± 104 | 182 ± 119#* | 232 ± 132#* | <0.0001 |
PAC, ml/mm Hg | 3.6 ± 2.1* | 2.6 ± 1.2 | 2.2 ± 1.1 | 1.8 ± 0.8†‡ | <0.0001 |
PA Ea, mm Hg/ml | 0.5 ± 0.2* | 0.8 ± 0.4* | 0.9 ± 0.4‡∥ | 1.1 ± 0.6* | <0.0001 |
Values are mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). Correction for multiple hypothesis testing was not performed.
p < 0.05 vs. all by Tukey’s test.
p < 0.05 vs. sinus HFpEF by Tukey’s test.
p < 0.05 vs. control subjects by Tukey’s test.
p < 0.05 vs. HFpEFparox-AF by Tukey’s test.
p < 0.05 vs. HFpEFperm-AF by Tukey’s test.