TABLE 5.
LA reservoir function | |||||
Volume/strain | |||||
LA maximal volume, ml | 44 ± 16* | 52 ± 19* | 71 ± 30* | 97 ± 41* | <0.0001 |
LA minimum volume, ml | 18 ± 9* | 24 ± 15* | 44 ± 24* | 74 ± 33* | <0.0001 |
LA reservoir volume, ml | 27 ± 9 | 28 ± 10 | 28 ± 15 | 23 ± 18 | 0.06 |
LA expansion index, % | 163 (122–209) | 147 (89–200)†‡ | 72 (39–104)* | 34 (15–54)* | <0.0001 |
LA total EF, % | 62 ± 11* | 57 ± 15* | 40 ± 16* | 24 ± 14* | <0.0001 |
LA reservoir strain, % | 40 ± 13* | 35 ± 15* | 23 ± 11* | 12 ± 6* | <0.0001 |
Pressure, mm Hg | |||||
LA x-v height rest | 5 ± 3* | 8 ± 6* | 10 ± 7 | 13 ± 7§∥ | <0.0001 |
LA x-v height exercise | 9 ± 5* | 19 ± 10†§ | 24 ± 12 | 22 ± 11 | <0.0001 |
Pressure-volume relation | |||||
LA volume compliance, ml/mm Hg | 5.5 (3.9–9.5)* | 4.3 (2.4– 8.5)* | 2.2 (1.4–4.2) | 1.7 (0.9–3.5)§∥ | <0.0001 |
LA strain compliance, %/mm Hg | 9.3 (5.7–13.7)* | 5.7 (2.8–9.6)* | 1.7 (1.1–4.0)* | 1.2 (0.7–1.4)* | <0.0001 |
LA conduit function | |||||
Volume/strain | |||||
LA pre A volume, ml | 30 ± 13* | 37 ± 16* | 56 ± 25* | – | <0.0001 |
LA passive volume, ml | 14 ± 7 | 15 ± 8 | 16 ± 12 | – | 0.5 |
LA passive EF, % | 33 ± 13 | 30 ± 14 | 22 ± 13* | – | <0.0001 |
LA conduit strain, % | 22 ± 10* | 19 ± 11 | 14 ± 6 | – | <0.0001 |
Pressure, mm Hg | |||||
LA v-y height rest | 4 ± 3* | 7 ± 7* | 10 ± 7* | 14 ± 8 * | <0.0001 |
LA v-y height exercise | 8 ± 5* | 18 ± 10* | 24 ± 12 | 23 ± 11§∥ | <0.0001 |
LA booster function | |||||
Volume/strain | |||||
LA booster volume, ml | 13 ± 6 | 14 ± 7 | 13 ± 10 | – | 0.5 |
LA active EF, % | 42 ± 11 | 39 ± 14 | 25 ± 17* | – | <0.0001 |
LA booster strain, % | 17 ± 8 | 17 ± 9 | 10 ± 6* | – | <0.0001 |
Pressure, mm Hg | |||||
LA y-a height rest | 3.2 ± 1.9 | 5.0 ± 2.6§ | 4.3 ± 3.0§ | – | <0.0001 |
LA y-a height exercise | 5.7 ± 3.8 | 7.6 ± 4.8§ | 8.0 ± 6.6§ | – | 0.0007 |
Values are mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). Correction for multiple hypothesis testing was not performed.
p < 0.05 vs. all by Tukey’s test.
p < 0.05 vs. HFpEFparox-AF by Tukey’s test.
p < 0.05 vs. HFpEFperm-AF by Tukey’s test.
p < 0.05 vs. control subjects by Tukey’s test.
p < 0.05 vs. sinus HFpEF by Tukey’s test.