Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 8;70(5):917–924. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz289

Table 4.

Model Performance in Predicting Aminoglycoside-induced Hearing Loss

Audiometric HL in Development Cohort (250–8000 Hz) Audiometric HL in Validation Cohort (250–8000 Hz) High-frequency HL in Validation Cohort (9000 Hz–16 000 Hz) Clinically Determined HL Validation Cohort
AUC (95% CI) 0.71 (0.64–0.79) 0.69 (0.56–0.81) 0.81 (0.69–0.92) 0.60 (0.54–0.66)
Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness-of-fit χ 2[8] = 6.10 (P = .636) χ 2[8] = 8.03 (P = .431) χ 2[8] = 6.48 (P = .593) χ 2[8] = 4.34 (P = .825)
Cutoff of 80% predicted probability, %
 Sensitivity 22.77 31.15 84.42 0.00
 Specificity 93.65 87.50 56.25 100.00
 PPV 85.19 82.61 90.28 .
 NPV 43.07 40.00 42.86 60.10
Cutoff of 40% predicted probability, %
 Sensitivity 90.10 100.00 97.40 52.44
 Specificity 23.81 12.50 0.00 58.30
 PPV 65.47 68.54 82.42 45.50
 NPV 60.00 100.00 0.00 64.86

Abbreviations: AUC, area under receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; HL, hearing loss; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.