Table 6.
Performance comparison with state-of-the-art methods using MESSIDOR-2.
Model | ACC | AUC | SE | SP |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gulshan et al.17 | — | 0.961 | 0.939 | 0.961 |
Voets et al.20 | — | 0.800 | 0.900 | 0.760 |
Rakhlin et al.54 | — | 0.970 | 0.990 | 0.710 |
Pratt et al.55 | 0.750 | — | 0.300 | 0.950 |
Gargeya et al.56 | — | 0.940 | 0.930 | 0.870 |
Ours | 0.962 | 0.979 | 0.967 | 0.891 |
Note: The values in bold show the best performing model results.