Table 7.

Performance comparison with state-of-the-art methods using DIARETDB1 dataset.

Model	AUC	ACC	SE	SP
Gondal et al.57	—	—	0.870	—
Shan et al.58	0.913	—	—	0.916
Quellec et al.59	0.954	—	—	—
Ours	0.988	0.971	0.968	0.901

Note: The values in bold show the best performing model results.