Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 14;10:1363. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01363

Table 3.

Performance of the clinical, radiomics, and combined models in distinguishing HGPs of CRLMs.

Models Clinical model Radiomicstumor model RadiomicsTLI model Combination model
Training cohort AUC 0.659 (0.514–0.803) 0.999 (0.997–1.000) 0.974 (0.940–1.000) 0.971 (0.927–1.000)
ACC 0.623 0.983 0.934 0.967
SEN 0.561 0.976 0.950 0.976
SPE 0.750 1.000 0.927 0.950
Internal validation cohort AUC 0.676 (0.484–0.869) 0.879 (0.741–1.000) 0.912 (0.789–1.000) 0.909 (0.785–1.000)
ACC 0.613 0.774 0.903 0.871
SEN 0.571 0.762 0.952 0.952
SPE 0.700 0.800 0.800 0.700
External validation cohort AUC 0.685 (0.563–0.807) 0.960 (0.919–1.000) 0.905 (0.841–0.970)
ACC 0.567 0.811 0.788
SEN 0.475 1.000 1.000
SPE 0.759 0.414 0.345

AUC, area under curve; ACC, accuracy; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity.