Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 14;11:930. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00930

TABLE 3.

Logistic regression analysis for live birth rate after FET among patients with different embryo transfer strategies.

Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) P-value Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) P-value
Cleavage-stage embryo transfer
SET-GQE 1.00 1.00
SET-PQE 0.40 (0.24,0.67) <0.001 0.49 (0.28,0.84) 0.009
DET-2GQE 2.46 (2.22,2.71) <0.001 1.62 (1.40,1.89) <0.001
DET-GQE+PQE 1.73 (1.50,1.99) <0.001 1.25 (1.04,1.51) 0.018
DET-2PQE 1.43 (1.07,1.92) 0.017 1.10 (0.78,1.55) 0.578
Blastocyst transfer
SET-GQE 1.00 1.00
SET-PQE 0.56 (0.43,0.73) <0.001 0.62 (0.46,0.83) 0.001
DET-2GQE 2.01 (1.61,2.53) <0.001 1.76 (1.20,2.57) 0.003
DET-GQE+PQE 1.54 (1.16,2.04) 0.003 1.42 (0.93,2.15) 0.101
DET-2PQE 1.14 (0.81,1.61) 0.450 1.09 (0.67,1.76) 0.726

SET, single embryo transfer; DET, double embryos transfer; GQE, good quality embryo; PQE, poor quality embryo; FET: frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Adjusted maternal age, maternal BMI, infertility type, parity, duration of infertility, causes of infertility, number of two pronuclear (2PN) embryos, endometrial preparation protocol, and endometrial thickness.