TABLE 3.
The association between Tinder use and romantic relationship formation.
|
In a romantic relationship at T2, reference category: single at both T1 and T2 (OR = 1.00) |
Models | |
| OR (95% CI) | ||
| Crude analysis | ||
| Tinder use | 1.31 (1.06–1.62)* | χ2 = 6.10, df = 1 |
| Cox and Snell = 0.003; | ||
| Nagelkerke R2 = 0.004 | ||
| Adjusted for demographics1 | ||
| Tinder use | 1.30 (1.04–1.61)* | χ2 = 12.41, df = 6 |
| Cox and Snell = 0.006; | ||
| Nagelkerke R2 = 0.009 | ||
| Adjusted for personality2 | ||
| Tinder use | 1.18 (0.95–1.47) | χ2 = 44.33, df = 6 |
| Cox and Snell = 0.020; | ||
| Nagelkerke R2 = 0.032 | ||
| Adjusted for mental health3 | ||
| Tinder use | 1.31 (1.06–1.62)* | χ2 = 6.99, df = 3 |
| Cox and Snell = 0.003; | ||
| Nagelkerke R2 = 0.005 | ||
| Adjusted for substance use4 | ||
| Tinder use | 1.13 (0.90–1.42) | χ2 = 34.06, df = 5 |
| Cox and Snell = 0.016; | ||
| Nagelkerke R2 = 0.025 | ||
| Fully adjusted5 | ||
| Tinder use | 1.08 (0.85–1.35) | χ2 = 64.37, df = 17 |
| Cox and Snell = 0.030; | ||
| Nagelkerke R2 = 0.047 |
Binary logistic regression analyses, n = 2385. T1, time of the first survey; T2, time of the second survey; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval, *p < 0.05. 1Adjusted for age, sex, country of birth, parental status, and religiousness; 2adjusted for extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness; 3adjusted for symptoms of depression and anxiety; 4adjusted for alcohol and illegal substance use; 5adjusted for demographics, personality, mental health, and alcohol/illegal substance use.